New Replies (Page 4,753)

no way it's pg-13...fox would be shooting it's self in the foot if it made Sir Riddley make a movie pg-13 when his direction was R....Not to worried...i'm sure he'll get his way and the movie will rock. Haven't seen a bad Scott movie yet

well like so much of this films speculation we have to sort the wheat from the chaff, that rumour is exactly that a rumour and all we really know for sure is whats been discussed by ridley and lindelof at comic con and the recent articles in the magazines, and press. The space jockey orgy is just another piece of supposition unless ive missed something.

Well some movies were rated pg13 or 15/16 despite of some really gross and scary scenes like in event horizon While some harmless movies like Residen evil apocalypse got a 18 rating in germany. I wonder why nobody here suspects that Fox might got through with a pg13 with prometheus through its influence, while some others With the same movie might end up as r rated!

imdb has event horizon classified as 18 / r

It should be 'R' rated and be a brave new threshold of thoughtful horror. Time dilation horror, adult Giger horror. Alone on a distant planet thousands of light years away horror. Not cheap jumps, frights and bumps. I agree wholeheartedly Jeystone, the Scott/Giger roots belong in '79 and the Necronomicon when the audience of that time was about to be plunged across a new horror threshold. Let it happen again and sweep away the teen 'safe' muck. A revolution in film is needed. Badly.

here here zeta.

I just want something that can only be described as profound, surreal, and disturbing.....that isn't asking much

jeez, chill folks. This movie [i]won't[/i] be, nor should it be a carbon copy of "Alien." If there's any gore/shock-content that doesn't make the theatrical cut, it will unquestionably show up on the blu-ray release. What? like you're not going to buy the blu-ray or DVD? Yeah, that's what I thought.

there are some simple things you can do to raise the fear threshold one is sound there are frequencies you can use to put people on edge that they can barely detect not soundscapes and atmospherics but raw hyper low frequencies. Gore and shock wont cut it for me i'm more terrified by the prospect of being taken out of ones equilibrium and the prospect of being unable to distinguish reality from fantasy. Madness and the loss of ones faculties is more terrifying then jumping out of a plane with a parachute or a bungee jump. Deep seated psychological issues which are attributed to individual cases as opposed to general audiences like phobias but those childhood fears and the strength of imagination like the boy alone in a dark room who creates demons in the wallpaper that is the core of fear. sexual, psychological, physical, sensory, and emotional, i'm hoping Prometheus taps into the lot and more. Gore and bumps in the night are secondary to all that for me.

I of course don't know the parameters of the rating system, but I think had Alien been released now- it would still be rated R. Yeah, the chestburster was gory, but no more so than many movies with a lesser rating today. I think the "intense horror sequences and disturbing images" will still be the determining factor, and I hope those are present in Prometheus. Ridley might be able to omit SOME blood and gore, but this movie still needs to be profoundly disturbing to truly stay in the "same universe" as Alien. If some of those scenes (or extended scenes) are on the director's cut BD, then I can wait for that. My curiosity is more with exactly WHAT this "epic" story will be, but as many have said already- I wonder how much they can scare us with a PG13 movie. I think it's rather humorous that some say they won't even go see this if it gets a PG13 rating. All the naysayers will still be in that $10 movie seat, just like the rest of us... I'm sure Fox is banking on that.

i agree with all of what your saying but initially i was taken in by ridleys announcement that he wanted to make a nasty sc fi epic and i was sold on that especially when it emerged it would take place in the alien universe. I have never heard ridley use that term before (NASTY) in any film he has made including Hannibal which was the last thriller he made. Its fair to say that i think it will be magnificent regardless i just hope there are some genuine nasty surprises in store .

i also think once you bring the word 3d into the mix its almost a licence to market to the young because your average adult without kids like me just cant relate to 3d in the same way . I and many of my friends are just not in the least bit interested in 3d so i feel that although i was part of the generation that grew up with alien me and my age group are not the target audience for this however its amazing to see the old fans coming out of the woodwork to take an interest in a genre defining film prequel and that may be something fox was not anticipating on the level that it has stirred debate.

The over use of back projection did not help aliens age well and burke looks straight out of the 1980s with his ben elton suit lol. I always felt he looked so out of place in that film.

blasphemy !

Altered, Aliens is still one of my favorites. I just got it on B-Ray. Target has Alien and Aliens on sale at $14.99ea Burke was supposed to look completely out of place thats documented in the making of the film. :P Regards, Rick

Absolute blasphemy! True though the rear projection doesn't look great today. However the vehicle design and the way the xenos moved and were shot is still nothing short of genius, even today.

i have the anthology on blue ray also . He's out of place in the context of the story yes but also in the context of the future. you know i like aliens to and i feel there's a lot of debate about what's better etc amongst the various movies but i respect cameron as a technician and film maker he's clearly a very talented guy and i think both him and ridley respect eachother's work cameron even states as much in the making of aliens and ridley's also stated he likes jim cameron and he raised the bar on many occasions . But on the issue of this topic there are elements that could be better even cameron said in his commentary i never got the marines right marines dont act like that in reality and he would probably change some things if he made the film these days. Even ridley has the tenacity to admit that there are things he would change about alien also had it been made today but those things were down to budget constraints and 8.4 million was not that much to make a classic sc fi but all in all i like the first two films and aliens looks overall great on blue ray as does alien i just feel alien has a timeless appeal even with the dodgy aspects of some of its effects i'm thinking ash's head and arms when he gets his head knocked off but for their day both movies are great.

Altered, I can agree with that. So of the backlighting doesn't look right. Also can someone look at the B-Ray Aliens and tell me if I'm seeing things. When they are in operations and medical I can see a real faint flash of light across the whole screen like a revolving white light because it repeats at normal intervals. I wonder if my Flat screen is going out and its jsut the refresh rate failing. Ender, It seems your Edited post poofed on ya. Send BH a PM so he doesn't think I'm out of my mind. I edit mine all the time and it goes adios on me. I have to keep a copy on my clipboard for when it does. Rick

yea as i wrote in another thread...aliens has not aged well...unlike alien3 which has aged very well indeed

It was made in 1985....it was the best technology at the time. You can't judge it now based on what we have today. 6 years later, Terminator 2 came out and look how far that came. I believe Aliens is still a great film. A lot was made and created for that film and I would choose Alien and Aliens above any new films that now come out which are just basically masturbating your brain for a few hours. Now we have countless remakes and Micheal Bay type of films where the story gets lost in these million dollar SFX and the story is well, horrid. Blasphemy! I say! Blasphemy! All in good fun guys!

well the topic is aliens has not aged well i'm commenting on that issue cain i never started the topic ! as for the rest of your post i agree whole heartdly with you. And debating how well a film holds up over time is a common debate and discussed frequently its part of the criteria of what makes something ultimately classic.

I'm afraid I'm going to disagree with the topic statement. The tank, the plane, the atmosphere generators, the touch-screen table, the pulse rifle, the autoguns, laptops, and the loaders. Damn all of that looks pretty good even today. Okay so a few execution issues but the story and the look and feel is not dated. I'd even argue that Burke is not necessary out-dated. Shoulder pads are back in nowadays so maybe sleeveless jackets are back in in the late 22nd century. Lol.

The kid on his Big Wheel with the Weyland logo: in your face, trite and bothersome. I also enjoyed the film, but James is apparenly not known for his subtlety. Acting was cartoony, but I was able to look over that. It was like a cartoon where the characters were a bit over the top. Al Pacino or Shatner would have been stellar! See where I'm going with this?

yeah all of these are minor issues and on the whole the film is still very current and watchable i guess we are highlighting things that could be ironed out given the benefit of hindsight.

The only thing I disliked with Aliens is the cranial changes made to the xenos. I can still go outside 33 years after seeing the first film and still fear that penis shaped silvery-black head falling from the sky to land, alive and well, in my back yard to grab me! Alien is timeless! But I would not oppose a total remake after Prometheus. Ridley, would you consider that?

@Luca: i could really go OFF on how much "Aliens" has turned into a cinematic joke to me, but i will do my best to "restrain" myself here aside from the the cheap looking set details, the back screen effect looked really bad, even back in 1986 when i saw it in the theater. both my friend and i noted how it looked like something from a "TV movie of the week" Cameron seemed to have a huge boner for the weapons / hardware in the film, but he seemed to have been oblivious to certain obvious details like said cheap screen " FX " i hated the fact that he turned what was once truly alien, into a "insect / hive" theory, even the face huggers and eggs looked like they had been dosed up with growth hormones and WHY the crystalline teeth...? (shakes head in disbelief) the "aliens" themselves looked like CRAP. really cheap / commercial end result, like Cameron was giving the middle finger to Giger's brilliant and detailed work in ALIEN the god AWFUL structure that we saw when the marines first begin to see the "alien" works on sub-level 3 was simply and utterly APPALLING to look at. i thought to myself "WTF..?!?" the true buzz kill for me regarding "Aliens" is the overall tone of the film, it just can not, nor will it EVER measure up to the film it's supposed to be continuing N E V E R i agree with you Luca, "Aliens" has not aged well at all. (looks like i ended up going off a bit after all) ah well.....

lol shardy i'm saying nothing else i was threatened with being burned at the stake for my comments like witch finder general..... lets see how you fare lol.

Lets not start another Alien Vs Aliens - Cameron Vs Scott thread huh ... I think 95% of people here love BOTH movies ...of course its perfectly right that someone say "i dont like aliens" " i dont like alien" but lets not start a stoooooopid flame-trolls war like its happening on MANY other forums ( alien prequel news and imdb for example ). Shardy theories are understandable even if i dont agree with any of them .

i still think aliens is one of the best sequals made because its not a carbon copy of alien. yes the sets and the xenos are a bit archaic compared to todays standards, but when you have that many to mass produce, details suffer. the queen was a bit much but james needed it to separate himself from ridley. plus its been his niche to make something bigger and better in each of his prior movies. i will say the queen wasnt better but it did fill in a plot gap.

@alteredstate" lol! you feel the gathering crowd wants to kill the unicorn! ha! i suppose an opinion is only as hurtful to some as it is true (or something like that) i think this debate will continue on, like Frantz has stated, it is a but redundant, at the same time, when i find other folks who feel the same, i can't help but identify with them, and feel compelled to let them know they aren't alone in that regard some folks on here bash ALIEN in the same way that some on here bash "Aliens" so i'd guess threads like this one are all subjective

Aliens is probably one of the best sequels ever made in the sense of scope that is when compared to the minimalism of ALIEN, but where Aliens falls short is in its character and tone. If one were to consider Aliens the second act of an overall 3 act mythology then it didn't bring the tragic drama that it could have brought. For example, the original Star Wars trilogy followed a model of classic story. And Empire which imo is "the" best sequel ever, took the characters to their absolute lowest and put them through their toughest challenges. Empire was a very dark film and since Sir Ridley had already took us down a dark path, Aliens should have been even darker, even more horrific in tone. But instead it was a everybody gets to kick ass action flick at heart. Yes it carried a different tone from the original and so it gave the audience something new with a new direction. But there were so many changes taken with the established continuity that it almost seemed as if the story was taking place within an alternate universe. Yes I really really love Aliens and I can watch it now and not feel that it's that dated, but it just doesn't have the same amount of quality that ALIEN has. What made ALIEN work was the same theory of economy of words. Less is more and with less you don't risk over doing it. Aliens had a huge budget for the time and it was just over done in a sense. Since this forum is about Prometheus I'm going to end my rant with, I hope that Sir Ridley doesn't over do it with Prometheus. I hope he brings us the same intimacy and quiet that ALIEN had but just expanded upon.

Yeah for a moment there it was like being stuck in the life of brian... jehova, jehova, jehova, i was half expecting a crowd of bearded women to bash the front door down and stone me to death lol but yeah debates like this will always raise their ugly heads and be thrashed out.

Aliens is a good thriller action film and science fiction, this more than clear that it shines with the light of their own and as has been said is the best of the sequels to Alien. We all know that Alien is the original canon but does that not make Aliens something false or badly designed. It is simply that they are very different films, each one has its own charm and grace; that on the one hand we have a claustrophobic horror and on the other hand we have a action thriller… Best regards

@alteredstate: "crowd of bearded women" ha! ain't that the truth!

i just like being dominated by women shardy lol wishful thinking lol

lol!

I firstly TOTALLY agree that Alien has not aged - it is still visually awesome and believeable. Aliens has definitely retained more of an 80s feel. The effects are not quite as good and nor is the quality of the cinematography (gets too technical for me to understand - different film formats etc). Otherwise this is a discussion on how Aliens measures up as a movie to Alien, My vote is that Aliens is a good ACTION movie that James Cameron used the Alien franchise for. It is not in the same SF/Suspense genre that RS aimed at. I wonder: if Aliens did not use the Ripley/Xenomorph franchise, would we still be talking about it today anywhere enar as much? I don't think so. It would be a good 80s Action/Shoot 'Em Up but not a SF classic. I admire Alien for not relying on GUNS to face the threat. To me that added more suspense than just the "Look At Our Big Guns" US of A approach in Aliens :)

Yes I agree with Frantz. Its stupid to get in such a debate, which has mind you, been debated hundreds of other times on different forums. Both films have aged wonderfully as well as Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection. I have the Anthology on blu-ray as well as a 55' Samsung LED tv in my room. Watching all the Alien movies on that thing is glorious lol. Honestly the blu-ray films of both Alien and Aliens are FANTASTIC. Alien is now in full screen with fantastic quality. On the Quadrilogy it looks great but it was in widescreen and didn't project the same quality image as on blu-ray with the Anthology. They remastered everything the sound, picture and definition. Its marvelous especially on a 55' LED Samsung Tv Aliens was also AMAZING. One of the great things about this film is that they took away the grain that was on the previous releases of Aliens. So take Aliens, remove the grain, remaster the picture, sound and definition and DAMN its sick as hell. I can't get enough. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection also look pretty damn amazing. They've remastered all the films. If you don't have a blu-ray player, get one. If you don't have a nice LED tv, you really need one. And if you don't have the Alien Anthology on blu-ray yet, whats wrong with you? LOL.

I think we are all sounding off and we all have our opinions defined we are not going to change minds by what we think regardless but in terms of debating the issue in hand we can always re -evaluate the merits of each film and clearly there are those that still wish to express something so although it may have been discussed before its one of those topics that will resurface again and again.