The fails of the ancient astronaut theory
Prometheus Forum Topic

Kane77
MemberOvomorphMarch 30, 20123812 Views57 RepliesThere are many books and boards discussing this themes, in fact I have the impression its the main thing right now. Of course, firstly it sounds interesting, (stunning for Sci-Fi kids, no question) more than ever in our technical advanced times. Even Scott refers directly to this theory, made popular by Erich von Däniken in the 70ies or Sitchin in the last years.
well, the ancient astronaut theory is rather a [i]believe system[/i] because it kicks but simply is not true. This is discussed on many boards like ATS, too.
There are some major fails in it, firstly it is no theory, because it simply is archeological not proofable. The attempts beeing made are very poor and they rather [i]jump[/i] to conclusions and [i]ignore[/i] scientific proof, when professionals answer. Another fail is to warp scientific data [i]against better knowing.[/i] This shows further more its a [i]believe[/i] system.
Its a fact that the popular writers of these books are in it [i]for the money[/i], thats their motive.
Sitchin for example was completely debunked, scientifically. Here´s a archeologist, who shows that :
http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/ancientastro/ancientastro.html
( even in the Prometheus trailer there is a popular ancient Sumerian tablet featured that he used for his books, an allegedley star map. )
Däniken was in jail, when he got his ideas of writing highly speculative books, that later became bestsellers of course. I watched some of Dänikens shows in germany when I was into UFOs etc in about 1990.
Another critic point is that this stuff has the [i]spiritual[/i] potential of beeing [b]literally[/b][i][/i] anti-christian, in its extreme.
But this particular theme is for those who are deeper into that.
http://beginningandend.com/prometheus-movie-return-alien-gospel/
cheers