mother ship

gameover man
MemberOvomorphApril 16, 20125137 Views46 Repliesso I've been watching you guys debate about this movie since I read about it a few weeks ago.
I have to bring attention to something common to Alien and Aliens (the only two movies scott will allow into the family) that I hadnt seen mentioned yet (very possible I missed it).
There is certainly a "mother" ship in atmosphere of LV --- , dispatching the Prometheus, much like there was for the Sulaco and in the original Alien on LV426. The fact that it seems certain that the Prometheus kamakazi's the sj's ship and sends it back to this planet, suggests that its another ship that lands on LV426.
I think that scotts suggestion that the link to "Alien" happens in the last minutes of this movie eludes to this movie playing out, the sj's ship crashing, and when it seems we've prevailed, another ship comes out of the ground and takes off, making all the heroes efforts irrelevant.
I think its the mother ship of the Prometheus that somehow scuttles the derilict ship onto LV426
April 16, 2012
Prometheus is the Human vessel, and not whats under ground.
If they wanted to destroy or re Bio/Teraform Earth and after the cew stop the one Derelict, the Engineers launch the mothership then if this movie is set in same universe and canon to Alien/s then with no human ship left how do they stop the Mothership from reaching Earth and dealing with us.
But indeed the way the ground is opening up looks different to the Silo the Derelict takes off from.
R.I.P Sox 01/01/2006 - 11/10/2017
April 16, 2012
no, no, you misread...i realize the Prometheus is the human vessel...when I say "Mother Ship", I mean the Weyland ship that brings the Prometheus, as it surely didnt get there by itself, just like the other movies. The "Mother Ship" is this missions version of the Nostromo.
Something brought the Prometheus to the planet. The Prometheus looks to be the cause of the sj's ship crashing in the preview, and assuming its not LV426, another ship has to make its way to the neighboring planet. And as someone else pointed out, the SJ in the trailer doesnt seem as big as the one Dallas Kane and Lambert find...although they do mention that he's "fossilized" and "grown out of his chair", i dont know enough about that to know if he could expand.
April 16, 2012
@yhms....The Nostromo did not have a mother ship. The Nostromo was in essence a tug boat hauling the refinery back to Earth from where the ore was mined. I do not believve the Prometheus would have a mothership either after viewing the drawings and diagrams. Everything the crew needs is contained on the Prometheus including the Cryo chamber. The only movie in the Alien Univers that used a mother ship was Aliens that I recall and that really cannot be considered such because it is more like a small militerized space destroyer carring a platoon of marines and their equipment.
April 16, 2012
There WAS some discussion a while back that seems to have fallen away. In the early set pics of the film, the name MAGELLAN was seen in several shots on doors and bulkheads of an obvious ship film prop.
I would not be surprised if there is another human ship, much like the "mother" ship in Alien. Perhaps the Magellan is the "booster" assembly for the Prometheus? Hard to say for sure, but it makes for interesting discussions at least.
Of course the original title of the film was "Paradise", so perhaps the original ship name was Magellan. Directors go back and change things all the time...
April 16, 2012
Big things have small beginnings
The truth is between those words.
Maybe a small organism is behind all this.
An organism that is programmed to create or to be
evolved into anything. From xeno to derelict spaceships.
imagine having the control over that thing.
April 16, 2012
@FromCyprus I think that is correct but Have you not seen this picture yet? Or rather the tiny wiggly baby Xenomorph predecessor like looking thing in it?
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v234/LT.HIGHTIMES/1a1Prometheus-Cinemagraph-3.gif[/img]
April 16, 2012
I think Chimera is right.
In benefit of yhms opinion, actually neither of the prometheus´diagrams or blueprints mentions any machinery for hypervelocity, sharp drive or the like. In my opinion this is not a hint of a human mothership, but further testimony that they rely on relativistic drive _ and for that, the "nuclear powered ion plasma engines" is enough. Then the need for the cryochambers.
I think this brings some problems to the whole Alien universe, by the way. Zeta Reticuli is 39 light years from Earth. If the facts in "Alien" happens only 30 years after Prometheus, we don´t have time to Weyland to know that the expedition was doomed. And if they don´t know that, how they would have provided the substitution of the science officer that resulted in Ash onboard the Nostromo?
April 16, 2012
Can't see a human mothership in here to be honest ... not sayin' there isn't one ... but then it COULD explain why Prometheus only has those 'nuclear powered ion plasma' engines .. and so NOT FTL capable drives? ... that would make sense ...
Some guys did discuss about Prometheus being a drop ship a few weeks back ... we didn't have the Weyland Press sheet then but we can now speculate more on this now ... I suppose ... :) ...
April 16, 2012
I agree and have a pic to show of that scene hold on 1 sec, it does not look like the Prometheus from this shot but admittedly it is hard to be certain that it is not in fact but rather it's Mother ship doing this....
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v234/LT.HIGHTIMES/A1aaims.png[/img]
April 16, 2012
@centrosphere ...
Snap-is ;) ...
@Sparty ...
Well there are also 4 drives going full pelt there too ... so I'd say it could be Prometheus ...
April 16, 2012
The only other human ship is the escape pod/lifeboat (which may or may not be called the Magellan).
[b]@Spartacus[/b] It is the Prometheus mate. You can see the four engines. This is the point where they put the pedal to the metal to chase down the derelict.
April 16, 2012
Ok, so the Nostromo landed on LV426 on its own, and their was no "drop ship", only the lifeboat narcissus ( i know the Nostromo was the large ship, i was thinking that they landed on LV426 on a drop ship). However, the Prometheus is more the size of the Sulaco's drop ship, which did not come that far out into space on its own. Theres plenty of reasons for a research ship to have a mother (backup, secondary) ship other than military reasons. A PLANNED expedition on an unknown planet would be a pretty good one.
We also do not see the Prometheus traveling through space, only entering the planets atmosphere.
I dont think I saw the drawings for the Prometheus, so I'm unaware if the cryochamber is definately in THAT ship.
April 16, 2012
@yhms.....take a look at this post. It has the officially released diagrams of the Prometheus:
http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/3397
Ya know, come to think of it after looking at the ship diagrams once more, there are a few cabins that I cannot identify by just the letters. I am getting a strong sense that they are extra cabins that are being used by Weyland like a luxury suite.
April 16, 2012
Yes I have seen the picture.
That little thing was create for a specific purpose.
To mutate that guy or to create something else out of his biomass.
The same as xeno.
Maybe the derelict ot the mothership was created from small creatures.
It sound like transformers but I thing we are going to see a similar thing in prometheus.
Super advance nano-bio-technology that you have to be a god to control it.
April 16, 2012
And if the cryochamber IS on the Prometheus, I dont think that necessarily means that it still couldnt have broken off from a larger ship. Even after correcting my argument, I think its still a valid hypothesis, and a possible explanation for what we assume this movie results in.
@allinamberclad...you're right, "certainly" is a poor word to use.
April 16, 2012
Gem]n[
"Snap-is"
Sorry, I don´t get it...maybe some slang I´m not aware of.
But I agree, you said it better than I: it all boils down to the fact that "Prometheus" lacks a FTL drive.
Of course, this is more or less at odds with this fact at the Weyland´s corporate timeline page:
[i]'Weyland scientists discover the inverse relationship between velocity and the flow of time making the long sought-after concept of faster than light travel a reality. The search for practical application begins.
May 2032"[/i]
This bored me a lot, because "the inverse relationship between velocity and the flow of time" is known as "Lorentz Transformation" and were deduced in the XIX century, with Einstein giving it the current interpretation. Worse: this has nothing to do with "faster than light" travel.
To me this is a strong hint that the Weyland site is actually directed at a very young audiences, something acknowledged by Scott himself when he talked about how much money he thinks the movie will make.