I love "The Crossing," but it may be a lie told by David, and I have been reading it's not in the movie.
Well, to create, one must destroy, so obviously brilliant things await.
Or do they? Is David going to be just another maniac who steals his good twin's identity? Did the flawless and original Noomi Rapace really need to be replaced by an actress who is pretty but in what has been shown so far, seems like a boring Ripley/Shaw clone? Rapace brought emotion to the sketchy writing she worked with. Daniels' message home to Dad depressed me. Bad acting. I could just picture the Law and Order guy getting her completely wooden, cliche hi/bye. A good actress but does not seem suited for the role. And is Tennessee going to stick out like a sore thumb in all the darkness?
The movie actually looks like a mix of Alien 3, Resurrection, and Prometheus. The Aliens will probably be as fake looking as the ones in Resurrection. Covenant truly looks like a bad Dark Horse Aliens comic. If you took away David, the movie would not even have the scope Resurrection tried to depict.
If David slaughters the planet's people just to do experiments or play God, and Shaw is written out, what's left? A boring crew, the hideous pale fake looking little backbursting retcons of Giger's authentic biomechanical demon, the fake headbanging Alien Resurrection slim jim monster that spooks our good buddy Tennessee...
I wanted a masterpiece. And "The Crossing" felt like a piece of one. Blood doesn't make a movie scary...it makes it nauseating.
I hope for the best but I believe the movie studio decided just to tell a generic sci-fi horror story, and ironically jettisoned the "intrigue" of the Engineers who were so disappointing in the first place as Giger Space Jockey Uncle Fester retcons.
A bad Alien movie at this point just means someone will have to reboot the first movie, which was perfection. That Scott is gone, and Giger is dead.
Five years for what looks like tripe. This movie is for all the marbles. Again: the Alien movies never quite recovered from the unnecessary deaths of Newt and Hicks. But Shaw was a leading character in Prometheus. It seems this movie wasn't planned out at all. Prometheus was good enough to make me care about what looked to be the story of David and Shaw on a shared quest for their creators.
And we get a boring planet, boring colonists, boring "action" and gore, Resurrection-style Aliens, Alien 3 grimness, and bursters that take away from the famous scene in the movie all this is leading up to. And Tennessee. Maybe he and Daniels will survive and do some more Last Supper product placement for Digiorno's pizza.
And it is impossible not to feel an AVP: Requiem vibe with all the gore and "everyday" characters.
But, even with Scott directing, the whole bottom line is to cut as many corners as possible and get non-fans to buy tickets. Disney's horrific Star Wars mockeries should give us all a clue--no one is worried about making art like Alien or just a great story like Aliens. Out in the woods of "Paradise," maybe we'll see the hunter and his son from Requiem and they can chew some 'baccer with good ol' boy Tennessee.