Forum Topic

MVMNT
MemberOvomorphMay-01-2012 6:06 AM[i]Excerpts from Wikipedia
[/i]
Serpents are represented as potent guardians of temples and other sacred spaces. This connection may be grounded in the observation that when threatened, some snakes (such as rattlesnakes or cobras) frequently hold and defend their ground, first resorting to threatening display and then fighting, rather than retreat. Thus, they are natural guardians of treasures or sacred sites which cannot easily be moved out of harm's way.
Greek cosmological myths tell of how Ophion the snake incubated the primordial egg from which all created things were born.
Some cultures regarded snakes as immortal because they appeared to be reincarnated from themselves when they sloughed their skins. Snakes were often also associated with immortality because they were observed biting their tails to form a circle and when they coiled they formed spirals. Both circles and spirals were seen as symbols of eternity.
4 Replies

dontburstmychestman
MemberOvomorphMay-01-2012 6:25 AMvery interesting. did not know about the Ophion myth. snakes and eggs seems to fit this new mythology nicely.
not to forget that in the text of the bible the snake is referred to as the giver of knowledge ( genesis), and as the devil (revelations).
and this from good old wikipedia..
The Rod of Asclepius takes its name from the god Asclepius, a deity associated with healing and medicinal arts in Greek mythology. Asclepius's attributes, the snake and the staff, sometimes depicted separately in antiquity, are combined in this symbol.[2] The serpent and the staff appear to have been separate symbols that were combined at some point in the development of the Asclepian cult.[3] The significance of the serpent has been interpreted in many ways; sometimes the shedding of skin and renewal is emphasized as symbolizing rejuvenation,[4] while other assessments center on the serpent as a symbol that unites and expresses the dual nature of the work of the physician, who deals with life and death, sickness and health.[5] The ambiguity of the serpent as a symbol, and the contradictions it is thought to represent, reflect the ambiguity of the use of drugs,[6] which can help or harm, as reflected in the meaning of the term pharmakon, which meant "drug", "medicine" and "poison" in ancient Greek.[7] Products deriving from the bodies of snakes were known to have medicinal properties in ancient times, and in ancient Greece, at least some were aware that snake venom that might be fatal if it entered the bloodstream could often be imbibed. Snake venom appears to have been 'prescribed' in some cases as a form of therapy.[8]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_of_Asclepius

Cypher
Co-AdminMemberOvomorphMay-01-2012 6:50 AMI love how there has actually been a lot of research and effort on the part of the production team to make this as real as possible and tie it into a lot of the ancient mythology we have here on Earth. It's awesome and makes me want to go and start studying more cultures I haven't looked into yet! :-D
[url=http://www.robocopmovie.net/][img]http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac89/snorkelbottom/NewRoboBanner.jpg[/img][/url]
"Is it dead this time?" "I dunno, poke it with this stick and see."

Heustess
MemberOvomorphMay-01-2012 10:35 AMThe word "python" (both the serpent or rocky peak) comes from the Greek dragon Apollo slew, and it's also the place at Delphi were the spring and mountain peak was supposedly guarded by the dragon. It's strange that the aliens were called "xenomorphic" (that is a chthonic formation) and that they used the same artist for both the Alien landscape and the alien itself, like if both creatures belonged to the same environment. It's without surprise the, that somehow that the "snake creature" we have seen in the trailer, is somehow related to the sacred relative to our religious spheres. -ref .^ Walter Burkert, "Kynaithos, Polycrates and the Homeric Hymn to Apollo" in Arktouros: Hellenic studies presented to B. M. W. Knox ed. G. W. Bowersock, W. Burkert, M. C. J. Putnam (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1979) pp. 53-62.
Add A Reply