Why "new" Xenos in the movie?

L.March
MemberOvomorphMay 04, 20122504 Views48 RepliesI don't understand why there's this question...
If we have the stories of ''Alien vs. Predator" telling us that for centuries the Yautja have visited Earth to make their ritual by hunting the Xenos, why are we talking about the creation of the species in Prometheus?
Wasn't it created a very long time ago?
May 04, 2012
AVP does not even count within this universe, just the "Alien" canon...disregard the poorly made AVP films, they have nothing to do with this universe.
May 04, 2012
The whole illegitmacy of the AVP universe precludes it I'm afraid:O( Prometheus considers the Alien Universe only for direction and inspiration. Ridley want's to tell us the how and the why of the events that took place on LV-426.
May 04, 2012
Because even though the original alien franchise is very exciting we really need to see something new on the table... I'm thrilled to see what these former creatures are like and how much they have in common with the xeno.
May 04, 2012
AVP is such pure total trash we dont consider it while talking about prometheus.
In my mind AVP movies never happened -_-
May 04, 2012
because AvP ruined the Alien for most of the fan base and the casual fan.
This movie cost minimum 3 times as much as AvP:R. Iit has to appeal to a new market to make back its money. Attaching that baggage to it would hurt the film.
May 04, 2012
But still there is a hope that they leave it behind.
I for one would like to see a special boxed set of Avp and AvP:R printed on toilet paper.
Ridley Scott will eventually tell us how the Queen was born.
Right now we have the Deacon; coming soon the Mercury, the May and the Taylor.
May 04, 2012
L.March.....for some reason most of the people on here can't cope with another series that isn't directed by Ridley Scott, they think of him as god for some reason and any other movie that was made about the aliens are just plain wrong, stupid and dumb. Of course some even apply that to the Aliens movie which was directed by James Cameron of Avatar fame! As I have said before FOX owns the Aliens franchise and the movies and what they say goes, regardless of Ridley Scott. By the way, funny how Brandywine Productions made ALL the Alien movies along with the AvP as well. So to say Ridley Scott has the only "right" version of the Alien franchise is just plain wrong. It's really what the studio allows him to do that determines what is made into a movie.....ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY OWN THE FRANCHISE AND THE ENTIRE ALIEN AND ALIEN VS PREDATOR UNIVERSE!!!!
May 04, 2012
I find it amazing people wanna defend AvP. You obviously have zero taste in movies.
Why do people respect Ridley Scott? Maybe it is because when you look on a list of the 10 best scifi movies, 90% of the time he has 2 movies in the top 5. 10% the top 15. That says about everything. I dislike all his non-scifi movies, but that in my mind can't be overlooked.
Also, I can repost how "Aliens" is a "Alien" remake via Rambo again if you want. How Cameron steals every major plot point and how the are pretty much the same movie just with a bunch of douche bag Marines and shitty explosions instead of suspense. It's like Alien on a inter-galactic serving of 'AMERICA...FUCK YEAH". Add in a shitty mother/daughter story to appeal to the females in the audience and BOOM. Shit on a stick designed to make a unique movie appeal to action oriented jocks. Woo-fucking-hoo.
I bet part of Ridley's contract said he didn't have to acknowledge AvP at all. He probably hasn't even seen them. And the re-write of Weyland is about the death knell for AvP.
I am still amazed people like the AvP movies. To me that would be something to feel shame for and to not admit in public. Something to only share with your psychologist....
May 04, 2012
Alien Drone, you're generalising a bit too much.
There is a whole spectrum of degrees of appreciation of the Alien franchise round here, from those who just see Alien as the only legitimate movie, to those who appreciate Alien Resurrection.
But on one thing the vast majority of the people on this forum (I could say of humanity, but I won't) agree upon.
The AvP movies were so poorly made that they are a shame and requiem (ironically) for the franchise. And if lots of teens appreciated those movies, and they were blockbusters, it doesn't mean anything.
There are lots of poorly made sci-fi blockbusters that, as entertaining as they might be, will be forgotten. AvP could be two of those.
The Alien saga will stay afloat because of its value, AvP movies are sinking and their only chance is their firm, desperate grip on the scrotum of Alien.
Painful and undignified.
Scott is not a god. But compared to Paul Anderson and the Strause brothers he might as well be.
Ridley Scott will eventually tell us how the Queen was born.
Right now we have the Deacon; coming soon the Mercury, the May and the Taylor.
May 04, 2012
The first film had some fun moments in it but the rest of it all is crap. I agree...however, that doesn't preclude Ridley having a little fun with ALL OF IT for himself like some slight reference or Easter egg, but I also agree and have said from the beginning both movies are a disgrace to the Intended nature of the entire franchise. There would be no point at all in anything more IMO than the use of the name "YUTANI". And I am going to be honest about this, even that isn't really necessary at all.
May 04, 2012
[quote]Alien Drone
Member
Send PM
REPORT
DELETE POST› Posted May-04-2012 7:07 PM | Moderate
L.March.....for some reason most of the people on here can't cope with another series that isn't directed by Ridley Scott, they think of him as god for some reason and any other movie that was made about the aliens are just plain wrong, stupid and dumb. Of course some even apply that to the Aliens movie which was directed by James Cameron of Avatar fame! As I have said before FOX owns the Aliens franchise and the movies and what they say goes, regardless of Ridley Scott. By the way, funny how Brandywine Productions made ALL the Alien movies along with the AvP as well. So to say Ridley Scott has the only "right" version of the Alien franchise is just plain wrong. It's really what the studio allows him to do that determines what is made into a movie.....ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY OWN THE FRANCHISE AND THE ENTIRE ALIEN AND ALIEN VS PREDATOR UNIVERSE!!!![/quote]
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh............ I'm gonna go get in the bomb shelter for this one............... And the AvP movies ARE just plain stupid and dumb. Also, Avatar looks good but sucks in the story department.
[url=http://www.robocopmovie.net/][img]http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac89/snorkelbottom/NewRoboBanner.jpg[/img][/url]
"Is it dead this time?" "I dunno, poke it with this stick and see."
May 06, 2012
So then I was right. There has been no attacking going on in this thread. Please proceed with the discussion.
May 06, 2012
Abordoli......saying I have zero taste in movies implies exactly that, I have no taste, which is attacking someone, it's saying I lack something, some type of ability to judge in some way. It also implies that others are more perfect than myself and better as well, simply because I disagree with their views.
May 06, 2012
OK....I'm going to say all of this just once more....I hope.......AVP is nothing more than a studio cash grab monster mash up like Freddie v.s. Jason. Just because some studio shlub decides he can wring the last vestiges of profit from the wet towel remnants of an idea, doesn't make it cannon. Hell, I Love the first two Dark Horse runs of 'AVP'...loved them, but never thought the universes were actually worth crossing and because someone in a studio office decided it was a good idea to line his or her pockets does not make it canon or even a good sideshow......
Also, there are plenty of examples where sequels are completely ignored as canon due to inferior quality and a lack of involvement by writers or directors of the original work.......'Psycho', 'Halloween', 'Jaws'.....all have a slew of sequels that no one pays much attention to for those reasons....heck, 'Halloween 2' was written by Carpenter, but beyond that none of it really matters......AVP, notice I don't even it give it the respect of qoutation marks, is cheap exercise in fanboy fun run amok with studio dollars and little sense....Canon it is NOT..........the fact of the matter is, there's no denying that AVP was an excuse to make money, as I said, some studio shlub decides he can wring the last vestiges of profit from the wet towel remnants of an idea......
Why has Ridley held off on returning to this universe for so long?....he has always said that he wanted the right story...because story is everything....With 'Prometheus', as he's said countless times, this is its own story, congruent with the alien universe, but separate and unique, a prequel that goes its own way, something FUNDAMENTALLY NEW....
AVP takes two different franchises, mixes em' up as a gimmick, STEALS from O'Bannon's original script and bastardizes those stolen elements to make money rather than art.........sure Ridley's made it clear wants a massive finacial success..there's nothing wrong with that, except in the moment it becomes the sole point of the damn thing......There is no attention to artistic detail, integrity, storytelling or purpose in AVP...it is, therefore, categorically undeserving of canonical respect....
....explain the absence of Charles Bishop Weyland in the weylandindustries.com Timeline....who, in AVP, is the founder of modern artificial human tech, not Peter Weyland as 'Prometheus' suggests..........the two timelines DO NOT mix or jive with one another for that reason.....how can you have a corporate timeline for Weyland Industries and NOT mention Charles Bishop Weyland?.......As to whether Weyland/Yutani starts as a single entity or is the result of a merger; sure, you say, "None of the Alien films stated that Weyland-Yutani started [as a merger]"...that's true, but none of them say it didn't happen that way either.........the notable absence of Charles Bishop Weyland is a clear and definitve repudiation of AVP.....that Ridley, Spaiths and Lindelof chose only to take the merger idea, does not, in and of itself, prove AVP occured as canon...if anything it does just the opposite wiith Charles Bishop Weyland being left out......
The only thing that will change this reality and fact of AVP's unimportance is Charles Bishop Weyland being mentioned in the film 'Prometheus'...Until we see that, there's no eveidence in your favor....sorry and I do say that with all due respect to you sir.......and there's this, direct from the timeline:
"October 11, 2012 - Weyland Corporation is recognized as a legal entity and corporation under United States law and receives their Certificate of Incorporation from the Companies House in the United Kingdom. Due to the combined value of Sir Peter Weyland’s various patents and patent-pendings, the company incorporates with a higher fair market valuation than any other company in history."
Isn't that 8 YEARS AFTER AVP when Weyland Industries is supposed to be an established Multi Biliion dollar corporate entity in AVP?
...we're going to claim there are two different Weyland companies existing coicindentally in the same universe, coicindentally inolving themselves with the same alien species?
I think this is getting just a tad ridiculous....
"Prometheus" is invalidating AVP...end of story....
May 05, 2012
Alien Drone I agree with you. I think AvP is shit but I'm glad they both got made, and hope they keep making them post Prometheus 'cause they're fun and deep down inside we're all excited about the idea of Aliens fighting Predators (fighting Schwarzeneggars- AvP 3 please). Ridley Scott has only made one movie I gave a shit about anyway and that was Alien. And its not because of the pacing, or the cinematography, or the sets or blah blah blah fanwank, its because of HR Giger (first and foremost), the writers of the story, and Ridley Scott's ability to fuse it all together into a single coherent whole. Without the other contributors who brought the StarBeast to Ridley Scott in the beginning (fifth choice director I might add) he is just another filmmaker with a far less impressive catalog of work than people give him credit for apart from Alien. Plus all this fanwanking is being used as a platform on which to sell this movie (see featurette). I for one, am not sold, and fully embrace the possibility that this movie can still suck. That Cobra whatever it is looks pretty f*@kin gay so far and defenitely does not fall under the category of "scary". As disgusting as its behavior may be, disgust and fear are not the same emotion (says James Cameron ((see Aliens DVD bonus materiel)).
May 05, 2012
Once again, no love for AVP around these parts. LOL
If Tom Rothman came out and said that he apologized for the AVP series and said they were purely for profit and were a mistake, and he officially took the series out of the timeline/canon/or whatever then everybody here that hates the movies would take that as enough proof that they're not canon because the Fox CEO officially said so.
Now if he came out and said that they were officially being kept in as canon I'm sure that everyone that dislikes the films would never take that as official enough to make the films canon and would keep denying any connection to the actual Alien universe.
A serious question for you guys, what makes them officially not canon as of now? Is it just your dislike for the films and not wanting them to be part of the Alien universe, or is there an actual official source that says they are not canon? It seems to be the former to me, but I may not have all the facts if you'd like to inform me.
Shane, that's not fair to say that I or any other member on here has no taste in films if we defend the series. I'm a fan of both franchises and enjoy all of the films and I have plenty of taste in films, it may be different then yours, but we still have some of the same tastes as well since we are both fans of the Alien series and are on here anticipating Prometheus's release.
L.March- to answer your question, if this film says that the xeno was just created during or after Prometheus then that will make these guys right and will pretty much officially take AVP out of the canon as the stories will conflict, but as of now they're not conflicting yet. We'll see after the film is released.
May 05, 2012
Once again, no love for AVP around these parts. LOL
If Tom Rothman came out and said that he apologized for the AVP series and said they were purely for profit and were a mistake, and he officially took the series out of the timeline/canon/or whatever then everybody here that hates the movies would take that as enough proof that they're not canon because the Fox CEO officially said so.
Now if he came out and said that they were officially being kept in as canon I'm sure that everyone that dislikes the films would never take that as official enough to make the films canon and would keep denying any connection to the actual Alien universe.
A serious question for you guys, what makes them officially not canon as of now? Is it just your dislike for the films and not wanting them to be part of the Alien universe, or is there an actual official source that says they are not canon? It seems to be the former to me, but I may not have all the facts if you'd like to inform me.
Shane, that's not fair to say that I or any other member on here has no taste in films if we defend the series. I'm a fan of both franchises and enjoy all of the films and I have plenty of taste in films, it may be different then yours, but we still have some of the same tastes as well since we are both fans of the Alien series and are on here anticipating Prometheus's release.
L.March- to answer your question, if this film says that the xeno was just created during or after Prometheus then that will make these guys right and will pretty much officially take AVP out of the canon as the stories will conflict, but as of now they're not conflicting yet. We'll see after the film is released.
May 05, 2012
I loved Alien, like Aliens, am OK with Alien3, am still confused how AlienR got mad (i.e. where did they get Ripley's DNA). I loved Predator, was OK with Predator 2 and have forgotten that Predators was even made. I liked AvP1 (because I'm into ancient cultures and pyramid looking stuff), but the only thing I liked about AvP2 was the "preggers" concept.
As far as mixing it all together.....I love milk and I love hot sauce. I just don't enjoy putting hot sauce in my milk and drinking it.
@Alien DNA,
I agree that the disdain comes from the fact that AvP2 was simply awful, however, I did see the very first opening shown on Christmas Day while the rest of my family went to see the Chipmunks and while in the theatre I did see some nuggets of "Alien DNA". I was sold into buying the ticket due to the fact that I had some enjoyment watching AvP1 and we were on vacation in Kittyhawk, NC, and we were going to the movies, and I didn't think I could have sat through the Chipmunks.
When the DVD came out, I bought it that the day it was released, but when I put it in and started watching it, I could not bring myself to watch past the cool Predator stuff. Pretty much when the pizza delivery scene hit, I was out for the count...BORED.