Please help me disprove my theory.

DoogieTalons
MemberOvomorphJune 08, 2012942 Views14 RepliesPlease help me disprove my theory...
I have read the official review of this site and seen the film and I can't see past my theory.
I have just read the official review of Prometheus on this board. The holes in the plot and indeed the confusion evident in the review seem to be able to be covered with my simple concept which I posted as a brain dump earlier this week.
The Engineers have encountered/created the Xenomorph many many years ago in the form we are familiar with from Alien. They have concurrently found a use for the DNA or continued development of same as far as a weapon and a way of seeding life.
The xenomorph we know from Alien is NOT an evolved version of the xenomorphs/chestbuster/snake/tentacles ect. The xenomorph we know from Alien is the original form of the Alien.
In the mural of the xenomorph we see a potential Queen and in the bottom left and right we see a depiction of the face hugger from Gigers original concepts about to infect a human.
I think the film makes perfect sense if the Sj/Engineers have encountered the Xenomorph AS WE KNOW THEM FROM ALIEN in ancient history, and what we see in prometheus is new in both evolution and chronology.
So forget your Prometheus proto-hugger and proto-xeno, these are just new and a side effect/danger/meltdown/inevitable consequence of mistakes of using the bio former.
Something as powerful as a component that can bioform a world from one Engineer is bound to have a few side effects.
I hold for posterity that everything in Prometheus is a result fo the Engineers playing with fire... the original egg laying xeno.
I would love to hear why this could not be so. Because is it the only plausable explaination for the ancient egg carrying ship in Alien with a chest busted Sj/Engineer.
Infact in good old fashioned scientific peer review I would like to hear Sound arguments that disprove my theory.