Why did they have to do it???

Arkadine

MemberOvomorphJune 08, 2012981 Views8 Replies

Prior to watching the movie I posted "I hope the writers don't use the "Seriously???" stupid expression so overused in almost every comedy of the last few years. Imagine my dismay when I hear Holloway say: "This is just one small step for man kind"to which Shaw replies in Emma Stone tone: "Seriously???" Guys, we are in the year 2093, you cannot come up with something better than that?

josiyah
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile

June 08, 2012

Because the use of that expression one time in a 2 hour movie bothers no one but you.

Arkadine
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile

June 08, 2012

Maybe, it is dumb nonetheless

josiyah
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile

June 08, 2012

Kinda, considering the context it seemed alright.. but yeah

db
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile

June 08, 2012

At least it wasn't "really?" or "dude"... Considering Lindelof's LOST connection.

artyoh
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile

June 08, 2012

In the end, Holloway wasn't such a douchebag after all. That was an interesting surprise, and added a bit of pathos to his demise.

Arkadine
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile

June 08, 2012

I prefer "really" to "seriously" for a long shot. But I reckon "dude" would have been bad! lol

It'sLikeAnAnthive
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile

June 09, 2012

I was pleasantly surprised by Holloway's character, still an a**hole but not as much as a douchebag as suspected. Shaw's expression after Holloway says "This is just one small step for mankind." is perfection.

Kevin Pauley
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile

June 09, 2012

Maybe we must remember that writers have to make dialogue that the general audience can identify with and "seriously" fits well in that moment as people of today watching that scene would probably say the same thing. Shaw is the audience's vehicle through the film.