allinambercladAugust 06, 2012Hm. Although, perhaps, phrased a little presumptuously, in my own opinion...nevertheless, I do think this is actually a very interesting question - and probably a difficult discussion to have.
That might be all the more reason to have it. Perhaps you have made it a little easy to dismiss it with a, "LOL", and also, perhaps, by making the wrong specific object the target.
I read your content quite carefully.
The actual query you have seems to be something like, "Why is it that the Engineers are actually [i]pale-skinned[/i], not [i]dark-skinned[/i] when, in the context of what we understand to be the origins of Man, it certainly would not be nonsensical if the the Engineers were black - and it might even make more sense, given the nature of this story, if they were?..."
If correct, I don't know why you would not just say and ask that question more directly, rather than present your conclusions and have the Forum struggle to determine how you are getting there?..
Anyhow, in respect of what I believe your actual question is, personally, I wouldn't say that, "Prometheus", in particular, was being racist in that regard - that is: not in any greater sense than anything else is racist - but that, in turn, is not say that Prometheus is not making choices that are dictated by its [i]environment[/i], and that those choices do, perhaps must, given the context, communicate only a version of a kind of Truth, which may not necessarily an [i]absolute[/i] Truth - but are a contextually comfortable and practical, "as good as", Truths.
Issues of the overall presentation of the Engineers did cross my mind a couple of times...but I formed an opinion about that, which is much less about, "Prometheus", and much more about, "Society".
There is no reason at all why they could not have been dark-skinned - it might even make more,"sense": but making them light-skinned is costless, in context.
Making them dark-skinned, within our current context, is not costless - it becomes challenging for a great many reasons and that then adds a dimension which, the Authors may have chosen not to saddle themselves with. That does not [i]necessarily[/i] make them, "racist" - it just means that telling the story with that dimension is a "needless" cost, given the story they are trying to tell and the context in which they are making the film?..
I'd say a person does need to be quite careful when using this word - it does have a goo-like potency all of its own - and I'm not all that sure it's always appropriate when we discuss some of the specific products, of a wider environment.