Daniels:Military training?

ninXeno426
Legacy MemberMemberPraetorianMarch 06, 201711278 Views40 Replies
Now I'm extremely excited about Alien Covenant,But Does anyone else find it hard to believe that in the space of one film,we are going to watch her go from a terraforming expert to a battle hardened soldier?I took Ripley a whole movie and a half before she picked up a gun.Not even Elizabeth Shaw,picked up a gun.Now I'm not saying it's impossible,perhaps she had some training prior to the mission launch,but it's still from this(picture below)to that(picture above)in the space of one film without proper context.
Nothing the God of biomechanics wouldn't let you in heaven for
@ Ingeniero, good catch! I'd forgotten about those, but based on what I understand about rifle mechanics (which isnt much more than any gun enthusiast) none of those upgrades require cosmetic changes to the existing AR platforms. They are all optic, ammunition and rifling enhancements that would leave the general shape and operation of the weapon system indistinguishable from existing technology. Which was pretty smart. Ironically some of those advancements sound cool, but have little or no tactical benefit.
Safe? Of course he isn't safe, but he's good!
Correct about the basic rifle- it is the same round that has been around for decades. Also agree about how she is pointing and not aiming the weapon and probably firing full auto wasting ammo- the Hollywood spray and pray lol!
Not sure about the UK laws and wasn't trying to reference that subject. Regardless, the round and basic rifle (with fairly minor alterations) has indeed been around for decades and for a reason.
Maybe the crew are trained in basic weapons skills regardless of their role for the mission ie; personal protection, they do the same in the defence forces, its part of basic training, everyone
has to be able to fire a rifle regardless of what they enlist as.
Yes. When everything goes sideways it is Soldier first. It would make sense to have that kind of people on the mission- even if they are still in cryo on the Covenant.
@dk, gidday mate, i know if i was part of mission like that as a civilian i would want to be able to defend myself against god knows what, and not rely on someone else to protect me.
Then it seems most would have at least some basic marksmanship and tactical training/proficiency.
Well the lab photo might have two weapons: one is already discussed and the other could be behind and to the left of the figure, being a British film it could be an modded SA80/L86A1 LS/L85A2 as well.
A double barrel with two different gages. Likely one for medium distance and the other for close encounters(probably not rifle rounds but shot gun 12-20 gage). As Ash asked-"What is the point?"
I've totally flipped now and I'm with you Inquisitor Fifield.
That most certainly is a Weyland Storm rifle shaped Engineer ant bed.
From the way she's holding the weapon, Daniels marksmanship training seems to have consisted of "the bullets come out that end, and this little switch makes them come out. The optics are just decoration"
Safe? Of course he isn't safe, but he's good!
I would say Daniels has no Military Background, it would appear she is unarmed at the start and only obtains a Gun off someone else once Hell Breaks Lose.
As far as the Gun Debate... we need to remember Aliens was set in the future and speculative about its weapons. Aliens also has some old school Weapons... Handguns and Shotguns..
We need to remember the Gunpowder Fire Arm has not changes drastically in a long time...
The only Evolution is.
*The Slug/Projectile as far as Material, Weight ability to cause more Damage. Armour Piercing, Explosive etc.
*The Propellant, more efficient cartridges that can propel the Projectile at a faster speed and more power
*The Firing Mechanism and Ammo loading Mechanisms, which allow for a faster rate of loading and firing Weapons.
We cant rule out if these have drastically improved in Alien Covenant, we also cant say how far Advanced Modern Weapons we have today would be in 100 years.... i think maybe they may not change to much... apart from the above points improve.
The other aspect is the Material and Design of the Stock and Rail system.... to make a Gun more Easy to Hold and Lighter, and i cant see this element changing in 100 years.
Apart from Lighter Materials used....
So if its not broken why fix?
You could take a Standard AR gun... lets say The HK416
If we invent a light weight composite alloy or synthetic material that makes something as hard as Titanium but nearly as light as Aluminum
I can see this used for the Stock of the Gun, the Magazine and even the Bullets... to provide a lighter more strong Projectile.
Maybe we have more advancements in the Propellant so a Chemical Reaction within the Cartridge that is more powerful than current state of the art Ammunition.
so we have a Gun that is as strong as the above HK416 but weighs half the weight, and its Ammunition is again less than half the weight with a more say 3X powerful Propellant so the Weapon can fire Bullets 3X faster and cause 2X Damage
Replace/Improve the Firing Mechanism and Magazine System to Fire Rounds at 3X standard HK416
Then you have a Futuristic Fire Arm... that would still look pretty much like the HK416 because the Shape of the Gun does not have to change to accommodate the advancements i have suggested
These kinds of Fire Arms are Practical and Cheap
Once we can manufacture a Energy Device/Battery System that Provides Much Much more Power in a Size of a Large Phone or say say a Can of Hairspray.
Then indeed we could see Weapons Change to give us Gauss Guns, Rail Guns... High Powered BB Guns and even Laser Guns
But at the moment the Electrical Requirements for these to be effective would not fit in a compact Fire Arm... You would need a backpack the size of TWO Suitcases to even mildly consider such a Weapon.
These things can be placed in Tanks and on Ships.. but we still use more advanced conventional means as its Proven, Tried and Tested and Cheaper.
R.I.P Sox 01/01/2006 - 11/10/2017
So i think the Weapons, The Ships and Technology in Alien Covenant is actually very accurate as far as potential in future.
Prometheus was a bit to Advanced... Aliens was ok but maybe the Weapons not so, then again such a Weapon is possible down the line... its means of Propellant and Casing are flawed as far as current similar methods... Prone to Overheating and Jamming.
R.I.P Sox 01/01/2006 - 11/10/2017
Yeah the Thompson (actual base frame for the pulse rifle) was popular because it was relatively easy to get, compact, and fully automatic. It isn't the most reliable weapon, it just lent itself to greater modifications due to its compact size. Current AR's with rail systems are arguably superior tactically to pulse rifles because there are more modular and therefore more versatile.
Safe? Of course he isn't safe, but he's good!