Crudup's death scene as the the most horrific chest burst ever?

QueenElizabethShaw
MemberChestbursterMarch 12, 20178372 Views13 Replies
After Ingeniero posted the above image in another thread showing Crudup's stunt double, I began to wonder.
Why would a stunt double be required for a chest burster scene?
I may just be poorly versed in what is normal for the shooting of a film, but I have not often heard of using a stunt double unless the scene involves the actor doing something that poses potential risk of injury.
Is it possible that this chest burster scene is going to be more extreme than what we've seen in the past?
Or did Crudup just do such a terrible job convulsing that they told him not to bother and called in the double?
If the double WAS in fact brought in because the scene is particularly violent, how would you feel about such extremes? Extremes such as violent seizures, breaking limbs, teeth, even his skull against the rocky terrain.
What if the backburster/headburster isn't at all what Ridley intended to outdo the John Hurt scene with? What if this Crudup scene ends up being the true one-up to the original birth scene?
I'm currently leaning towards Crudup not doing a good job (or perhaps incapable due to a previous injury) and requiring a replacement. Still I figured if this "extreme chestburst" thought was worth considering, it was worth discussing.