ENGINEERS' TEMPLE
Prometheus Forum Topic
You have my sympathy
MemberOvomorphJanuary 11, 20122796 Views41 RepliesHAS ANYONE NOTICED WHAT LOOKS REMARKABLY LIKE A VERY LARGE BUILDING BEHIND THE CRASHING ENGINEERS' SPACE CRAFT. SEE PICTURE 39 ON THE EMPIRE TRAILER BREAKDOWN ON: http://www.empireonline.com/features/prometheus-trailer-breakdown/p39
Other discussions started by You have my sympathy
Replies to ENGINEERS' TEMPLE

FrantzJanuary 11, 2012
yes i think is something not enough discussed yet ..is part of the temple ? another construction ? of just the other horn ?

pjrJanuary 11, 2012
Great find - I never would have noticed that, but after looking carefully at the trailer I believe it is a large building!

StarbeastJanuary 11, 2012
Me and danrald discussed this on a previous post but danrald thought it was the other end of the crashing ship which later self-righted itself into its eventual resting position. All guesswork, admittedly. The trailer was really packed with more questions wasn't it?!
pjrJanuary 11, 2012
I too started out thinking it was the other side of the ship, but it's very rectangular whereas the ship is very curvy. Yes, the trailer is really packed with food for thought!

deadcellJanuary 11, 2012
true, the original script said they found the derelict but behind it was a dome where they found the eggs, not in the bowls of the ship.
GuestJanuary 11, 2012
I think the size of the SJ ship is making it difficult to judge this shot.
AVPGalaxy has high res pictures so I'm going to reference those.
http://www.avpgalaxy.net/gallery/albums/movies/prometheus/trailers/20111222_teasertrailer39.jpg
If you look at this shot, I think it's pretty clear that this image takes place after the mid air explosion or collision. You can see wreckage all over the ground. I would think that if there was a seperate temple, it should be partially visible in this picture?
I think it's all part of the ship. The ship is so immense that it looks like a seperate structure.

JeffomorphJanuary 11, 2012
AVPGalaxy has high res pictures so I'm going to reference those.
http://www.avpgalaxy.net/gallery/albums/movies/prometheus/trailers/20111222_teasertrailer39.jpg
If you look at this shot, I think it's pretty clear that this image takes place after the mid air explosion or collision. You can see wreckage all over the ground. I would think that if there was a seperate temple, it should be partially visible in this picture?
I think it's all part of the ship. The ship is so immense that it looks like a seperate structure.
artyohJanuary 11, 2012
What you describe as a "building" is actually the other "horn" of the SJ ship striking the ground, just before the closer end near Rapace/Shaw does so. The ship turns ~ 180 degrees after the impact/explosion high in the atmosphere, and strikes with the rounded end up. ( [b]horns down[/b] ) It then rolls across the ground until it stops with the rounded end on the ground, and the horns, sticking straight up in the air. ( the shot where Rapace is staring at it ) The most amazing thing about the whole sequence, is that the ship ramains intact.

EGR101January 11, 2012
The derelict ship when sitting upright does reveal something peculiar.
Look at the the right arm of the ship with two protrusions coming out of it, one longer than the other.
http://www.avpgalaxy.net/gallery/albums/movies/prometheus/trailers/20111222_teasertrailer39.jpg
Reminds me of a very popular hand sign, probably the most popular:
http://dc355.4shared.com/img/oGZPNzio/s7/justin_bieber_hand_gesture_hor.jpg

pjrJanuary 11, 2012
Your description of the ship's crashing down with it's "horn's down and then rolling until the horns are sticking up is very interesting - have you seen some footage I havn't?

EGR101January 11, 2012
The general consensus in this forum or anywhere else seems to point to the fact that that Giger-like structure crashing down on Noomi & Charlize is part of the derelict ship. I think this may be something else. There are 2 different scenes. Ridley did mention in one of his interviews that "something so small" becoming "something so large" What is it? I can't wait for June to come.

GehirnJanuary 11, 2012
It seems BLONDIE and ABGIRL started running from under the ship, which means not only did they have to avoid the final tail part, but also the mighty UBERFIST too.
Kind of silly for ABGIRL to wander off from a safe observational position in the middle of the horseshoe to its ROTATIONAL PATH OF DOOM.

birdmanJanuary 11, 2012
I agree that it is also part of the derelict ship. But in the beginning of the trailer, when the bay door opens and vehicles proceed to exit the human ship, the "building" in the distance sort of resembles the derelict laying flat. Not like in Alien or Aliens, but completely flat. Just a thought.
artyohJanuary 11, 2012
@pgr
I simply downloaded the trailer in 1080p and watched it uh......[i]several[/i] times, advancing/reversing frames, etc. Doing that carefully, you can actually make out the fin-like structure on the "horn" in the distance, as it strikes first. On the main page of this site, there's a shot of the SJ ship with a large gouge just to it's left. In the trailer, there's a shot of Shaw staring at the ship with it's "horns" upright, some distance away Though the trailer doesn't actually show it, the sequence of events I described is really the only one that makes sense in context with the visual evidence we [i]do[/i] have.

StarbeastJanuary 12, 2012
Engr101 has identified something important: the protruding "fingers" on one of the ship's horns. Now when the ship comes to rest, the horn with the fingers is at the front. Now let's take the theory that the ship made landfall upside down and rolled back upright. But surely the impact would have crushed the fingers of the horn, yet they appear pristine.
I'm not so sure anymore about the horns-first crashing, which leads me to reconsider the background "building" as another object.

EGR101January 12, 2012
[img]http://oi40.tinypic.com/t5mwph.jpg[/img]
From the trailer, it seems to me that something is rolling towards the two girls instead of crashing straight from above. The background piece seems to be moving/rolling with the front piece. It's difficult to accept that this is the same derelict ship that crash-landed -flat- in 1979's ALIEN (see below). Plus, look at that terrain on LV 426. You can see denser formation of jagged rocks as opposed to the flatter landscape from PROMETHEUS (see above).
[img]http://oi41.tinypic.com/f1xu34.jpg[/img]

BiomechanicJanuary 12, 2012
Here is my take on how it crashes.
[img]http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc389/bongobat/Fun%20on%20the%20Internet/derelictcrash2.gif[/img]
Derelict Model by [url=http://www.md3d.narod.ru/aliens/derelict.html]Denis Nefedov[/url]
Krak FoxJanuary 12, 2012
If you sloooo-mo the trailer you can see the back section rotating together with the front part that hits the ground, proving its part of the ship. It's the part of the ship that's in the centre of this Alien photo - you see the small section that sticks out on the right hand side top corner of the front bit? you can see that on the side of the rear section of the ship in the trailer...
[img]http://application.denofgeek.com/images/m/75spaceships/main/derelict.jpg[/img]

artyohJanuary 12, 2012
You can see the base of one of those "fingers" in the first shot that Engr101 posted. It's just above the the pointed rock on the far left of that shot. Biomechanic, the "fin" on your model is reversed from its' actual position. It should be on the bottom side of the ship. (look at the model in the shot Krak Fox posted ) You can actually see it in the trailer, several frames before the one Engr101 provided. If the ship was landing on its' "rounded" end, we would be able to see some of that structure in the shot above. Starbeast, we would expect [i]the entire ship[/i] to be crumpling up and collapsing like an aluminum can from an impact like this. The fact that it doesn't, indicates that the SJ ship employs construction techniques and technologies beyond our understanding.

BiomechanicJanuary 12, 2012
The fin is correct there is both a small upper fin and a longer bottom one you don't see in my animation.
Giger's derelict off which this model was constructed is different slightly from what we see in the trailer though. Their could be fingers like that on the jutting tube on the far side. We never see that side plainly. I think it could look like what is planted first.
However here is what the alternative might look like but it seems too awkward for my taste:
[img]http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc389/bongobat/Fun%20on%20the%20Internet/derelictcrashalternate.gif[/img]

FrantzJanuary 12, 2012
very interesting Bio ...can be that the model of the first animation remain a few seconds in the "horns up" position and then fall on a side ( quite realistic ) ?
Krak FoxJanuary 12, 2012
Some things to help clear this up.
start by looking at the shot of the mid air explosion - you can clearly tell the ship is rotating as it falls.
Here's a shot of it just after impact:
[img]http://garrick.lesniakswann.com/ship_crash.jpg[/img]
I've marked the impact point in red - it looks like it's on a slight bank and judging by how far it's rolled by the time this shot has been taken, it looks like the initial impact was on the ships left 'arm'. Comparing the way it impacts on it's left arm with it's orientation in the explosion shot - it's clear that it's done a approx 720 rotation from the explosion in the sky to the impact on the ground.
The ship then roles down the slight decline onto it's back (the bit with the famous 3 openings in), on to it's right hand 'arm', it's back section then goes over the top. Q this image (the so called 'temple' image):
[img]http://garrick.lesniakswann.com/ship_end_over.jpg[/img]
Here's a shot that matches the red lines so you can tell what part of the ship you're looking at above:
[img]http://garrick.lesniakswann.com/ship_top.jpg[/img]
Note how the arrow shows the point of view.
The ship the slows it's rotation and settles with it's arms in the air - the shot with Shaw
looking up at it..
This should help Bio do a very accurate animation - starting from it's mid air orientation?

StarbeastJanuary 12, 2012
Some really compelling arguments here. Must give credit to how the points have been conveyed and put across so well - I've changed my mind three times in quick succession!

deadcellJanuary 13, 2012
true, but did you notice that in alien the ship is intact but in the special editon of aliens, its far side is broken off and newts parents enter through the opening where the "arm" is detatched. just a thought

EGR101January 13, 2012
Deadcell is right. The derelict ship has a broken arm in this screenshot (see below) from 1986 ALIENS. Something may have happened between events after Nostromo blew up and the colonization of LV 426. Or the filmmakers just make stuff up as they go along.
[img]http://oi42.tinypic.com/o0z2hg.jpg[/img]

EGR101January 13, 2012
@Biomechanic
Well, according to the analysis & the animation done in this thread, the ship survives intact after the fall, nothing is broken. If this is the same ship, then it contradicts the image in ALIENS. Or, it is a different ship ! One of many, maybe? It is speculated that the SJ visits many star system to seed life, or eggs, or bio-weapons etc.

BiomechanicJanuary 13, 2012
I think that was explained as damage done by volcanic eruption but personally I don't take anything in aliens as being canon.
Has anyone else noticed the hull of the ship is bent though. Look at the arms of the ship in the explosion pictures and then look at the derelict in alien. It could be the impact of the tumbling warped the ship.

BiomechanicJanuary 13, 2012
Ah true when it is standing vertical it's arms still look straight. If it is the same ship it might bend when it falls or sometime during the period before Alien. Or maybe it is a different ship like you say.
Krak FoxJanuary 13, 2012
There are clear design detail differences to each of the two ships - so i reckon they're not the same ships...

RakkasanJanuary 13, 2012
The arms "look" straight in the upright image, but that is an illusion from the viewers perspective. The right arm is clearly bent, but we are looking at the tip of the left arm giving it a straightened appearance.
I initially thought the volcanic activity cause the broken left arm, but if a ship tumbling across a planet after suffering an explosion and falling from who knows how high didn't cause that type of damage; then how could volcanic activity?

GavinJanuary 13, 2012
Clarification of the Derelict in Alien and in Aliens I think is needed...
In Alien the Derelict is seen flat not vertical as the Prometheus trailer shows. It is possible that at the end of, or after Prometheus the Derelict simply topples over. This could happen for a variety of reasons (insanely strong winds, duststorm, earthquake, settling of the surroundings etc.).
Now in Alien Dallas, Lambert and Kane entered the flat and intact Derelict from the middle "vaginal" entrance, found in the centre of the craft, behind and below the cockpit.
Yet in Aliens Newts parents entered the same craft via a whole from the fallen hammerhead shark end of the Derelict. The story reason for this was volcanic activity had damaged the derelict. In reality the original model from Alien had broken.
I repeat...The Derelict in Aliens is the same one as in Alien - Newts family were sent there from the co-ordinates given by Ripley herself, under Weyland-Yutani orders, signed Carter Burke.

deadcellJanuary 15, 2012
true, but would both entrances led straight to the jockey room. maybe they found something different. remember newt said they had been gone a long time. how long is a long time

GavinJanuary 15, 2012
its possible they never saw the SJ, but in Jim Camerons original treatment they did, and it was half buried in volcanic ash.
Are you an avid Alien fan looking for a dedicated online community of likeminded fans? Look no further! Create your own profile today and take part in our forums and gain XP points for all the content you post!



