Hoping the 'operation' isn't the 'money shot'

ZetaReticuli
MemberOvomorphApril 17, 20123151 Views46 RepliesIt's been too easily deduced from the trailer by the nitpicking nitboys
- shocking, yes, but in a predictable way even if the gore is off-screen.
Self-operating/mutilation is not original. Gory, but ultimately - boring.
I think it might be something else. Why would 'the-scene-to-rival-the-Chestburster' be spoiled by showing even the tiniest hint in the trailer?
April 17, 2012
Have to agree with you ZetaReticuli. I reckon there'll be something a bit grottier ;-)
[url=http://www.robocopmovie.net/][img]http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac89/snorkelbottom/NewRoboBanner.jpg[/img][/url]
"Is it dead this time?" "I dunno, poke it with this stick and see."
April 17, 2012
Unfortunately I have to disagree my friend. If you take a look the panel that just took place in France, Ridley and Noomi talk vaguely about that scene. She mentions how it messed her up mentally after the performance and how it was filmed privately with none of the other actors present as it was very personal. I'd imagine for a Woman that sort of scene wouldn't be pleasant to go through, especially if you haven't actually given birth yet.
April 17, 2012
I think originality is over rated and hard to do these days. The way its executed is just as effective as being original IMO.
April 17, 2012
You make a good point @WhyDontTheyFreezeHim
[url=http://www.robocopmovie.net/][img]http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac89/snorkelbottom/NewRoboBanner.jpg[/img][/url]
"Is it dead this time?" "I dunno, poke it with this stick and see."
April 17, 2012
Well...it could be pretty nasty in the film. I mean, we haven't seen it yet. A quick second snapshot with no sound doesn't reveal much. Sound can add a great deal to a scene, think of the noises John Hurt made during the chest burster scene. An emergency cesarean sounds pretty awful.
Just as a side note...do you think Ridley knows that we all know about this scene? Its just that there has been so much secrecy around this film, yet the trailers give away so, so much! And at the Paris panel, Noomi started talking about the scene, and Ridley made an attempt to keep it under wraps.
Are the people at Fox aware we have VLC media player to step through each frame of the trailer haha?
April 17, 2012
It´s clearly the moneyshot. It´s only us who actually see what is going on in theese trailers! For the regular audience they have NO clue what so ever.
Shaw is giving birth to the squid. If we did not know this we would be shocked in theathres. Think about it. Here is the lead character. A nice girl who is in love with this Holloway guy. Suddenly she gets pregnant in this hyperspeed and have to cut out what we think is a spacehuman or some kind of humanoid looking creature.
what comes out is a slimy, giger-ish looking blob with tentacles.
It´s a fu.... moneyshot right there!!
P.s think about all the females watching this film. They gonna hate it. LoL
April 17, 2012
[b]@clovenberg[/b] I totally agree. Put a bit of thought to it, and its very clear that this is messed up. She's violently attacked/raped by her own boyfriend and then she gives birth to well...a squid instead of an actual child, that is properly messed up.
April 17, 2012
[url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,311117,00.html]Here is the SHAW SQUID!
[/url]
April 17, 2012
Not that this anything to do with anything, but who remembers how much of the original chestburster scene in Alien do we actually see in those ads? I haven't gone through it frame by frame, but the scene wasn't even close to being in the trailers. And as we all know, even most of the cast didn't know what was going to happen when they filmed it. Ridley Scott's films are terribly subtle, whatever emotion they are trying to convey. So, I give him more credit than that, and will bet the price of my admission ticket that he knows what hes is doing.
April 17, 2012
ZetaReticuli
I have the same opinion about sir Ridley scott showing more than just images of the "chestbuster" scene of shaw giving birth to the "squid baby", Its like giving all the spoilers scene of the "one" of the more gore scenes of the movie.
My opinion is that the "money shot" maybe its the scene is related to the alien worm organism that is on Holloway eye , being transfered to shaw via sexual. an interior scene inside of her something visceral scene.
just speculating here.
April 17, 2012
I doubt it... for 2 reasons...
1-everybody who's seen Alien is probably expecting a scene like the chestburster. They want to fool you into thinking the c-section is the big scene, so after it's over everyone will let their guard down for the rest of the movie. That's when Ridley's gonna get you!
2-It's in the trailer for cryin out loud!
April 17, 2012
People have to remember that people are not as scared any more of special effects, as years go by they get better and better.
But off course well done scenes with sound can make you jump and tence scenes can have a good effect.
But as far as Gore Goes nowadays the Chestburster scene is not shocking, only when you first see it and it may make you jump as you dont see it comming.
So the C-Section scene is going to be less gory than the Chest Burster one, i cant see whats so shocking about that scene unless its what happens after (i.e when the Squid is above her head).
I would say Ridley is a arogant and proud person, by that he knows he set a standard with the Chest Burster scene and so someone like him would not re do such a thing.... THEY WOULD TRY AND BETTER IT
And to me the C-Section does not raise the Bar over the Chest Burster.
The Scenes we have seen have so far shown us that a Squid is taken from Shaw via C-Section, they have shown that some Eel/Worm Organisms go around and potential change the crew into mutants/hybrids. We also have seen the Space Jockey as what looks to be the Blue Guy.
Now unless there is more to those above things and they are misleading us in the Trailers, there must be a few MONEY SHOT moments in the movie, you would say that the last 8 minutes that may tie in the Derelict/Pilot and Eggs on LV426 in Alien is a MONEY SHOT scene as they given not much away about that.
So i cant see how the C-Section is another one of those moments because we have already seen in the trailers what becomes of that.
R.I.P Sox 01/01/2006 - 11/10/2017
April 17, 2012
I disagree. We can't rule this scene out just because we've seeen a single second snap shot in the trailers. Although we now know what the scene is (fans on this forum) we've not actually watched it.
The average movie goer won't have noticed this in the trailer as it flashed on screen. We've only spotted it through careful analysis and freeze-framing.
We might not find it a shocking now we know what's coming, but it might be disturbing to someone who has no idea it is going to happen.
April 17, 2012
Well some was going on about the Mural of the Life Cycle and how the Derlelict inspired image was indead Shaw and there was a eye inbetween her legs that had a worm in it and the Eggs come from that..... Which links Shaw matting with Holloway = Egg.
Well Giger has other works and one shows a Worm that is well, apears to have entered a female and the female is changing.
Now we cant show that in a movie not if its gonna be PG 13....
But as i said before if we took Gorillas in Mist and Weaver has a half Ape half Human Baby... we dont have to show any Sex Scene to work out what happened.
A Gorilla taking her into a Bush and her screaming without seeing anything is all thats needed to join the dots.
Thus i dont think the Impregnate Scene is going to be between a Human looking Holloway and Shaw as they have something for each other.
Its either going to be between a mutated/hybrid Holloway or some other Alien Organism.
R.I.P Sox 01/01/2006 - 11/10/2017
April 17, 2012
@Mentos
I agree that the scene would be shocking to a degree, but we have seen that there does not seem like much blood and we seen the Organism being held in place above her head. The only missing part is seeing it cut out of her which i cant see how it would rival a Chest Burster.
And as you said the scene would be shocking and a suprise to those who never saw it, especially Alien fans....
But then maybe Fox/Ridley have dropped a big big boo boo by Showing that scene.
They should have left the Scene out of the Trailers, it would have held more of a effect in the movie then.
I doubt Ridley would have allowed that Trailer to be released if he did not agree with it, i recon when Fox goes to release a Trailer they allow Ridley to see it first.
So either they have dropped a big boo boo, or there is something else, or something more to that scene and just after.
R.I.P Sox 01/01/2006 - 11/10/2017
April 17, 2012
[b]@BigDave[/b] I hope the scene looks great when its finished. But you are right 100%; they should have left it out of the trailers.
April 17, 2012
I agree with others that this IS the money shot. For the majority of fans, they would have no idea what was in the trailer. It took me a few watches to even get a hint of it, before I looked at the freeze frames provided on here. Joe Public wouldn't have a clue.
On one of the interviews with Scott that was linked on another topic, he said how it p*sses him off that some people (us!) over analyse and break down everything in trailers and discussion forums. The trailers have not been made with us in mind.
Personally, I can't think of anything worse than a woman being inpregnated by an alien and having it removed.
April 17, 2012
Can I just say this one thing because I feel like ROYAL JELLY right now from reading this thread...CLEARLY...CLEARLY...AND IT'S SOOOO CLEAR YOU CAN EVEN TELL FROM THAT TRAILER...BUT CLEARLY...[b]THE MONEY SHOT IS THAT OF THE JOCKEY SUIT OPENING UP AT THE END OF THE TRAILER[/b] AND I THINK IT'S HAPPENING AT OR VERY VERY CLOSE TO THE VERY END OF THE FILM.