Another Roger Ebert thread

[url=http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/7117]Roger[/url] [url=http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/7071]Roger again[/url] [url=http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/7060]Another Roger[/url] [url=http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/6264]Roger Dodger[/url] Regardless, Roger will always be a credible reviewer but when I see some blatant consistencies in reviews in which you criticize a film of blatant plot holes and not on another one; then I do not know if you are being sincere in your analysis unless your eyes have "matured" and view things from a different perspective. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Along_Came_a_Spider_(film) Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times stated, "A few loopholes I can forgive. But when a plot is riddled with them, crippled by them, made implausible by them, as in Along Came a Spider, I get distracted. I'm wondering, since Dr. Alex Cross is so brilliant, how come he doesn't notice yawning logical holes in the very fabric of the story he's occupying? ... The film contains two kinds of loopholes: (1) Those that emerge when you think back on the plot, and (2) Those that seem like loopholes at the time, and then are explained by later developments that may contain loopholes of their own ... There are places in this movie you just can't get to from other places in this movie."[4]