Just for Juxtapose-Do Androids Dream of Electronic Vickers' Knickers while in Hy

at first I truly though he was just being intelligent and sly, until I read the 2nd one he made...LMAO...my bad you guys!!! and for what it's worth I cringed the 2nd I saw the words he write in it's title!!!

well Craig, for such a non interesting post, it sure did generate a lot of responses. This Ushbuck guy kind of sounds a lot like me, lol. Misunderstood from the start. I have read the forum since the off but I haven't noticed him on any of the posts, lol. I'll have to have another read through at some point. He sounds like a right old scallywag, lol With regards to Michael Fassbender's android sexuality, in Alien, wasn't the scene where Ash chokes Ripley a sort of extension of his sexual frustrations towards her, poor chap, it must have been a hard life not having the tackle to tango. LoL

...u mean male androids don't have genitalia?....ok scrap Michael then..lol

Thats always got me as that one, Synthetics in the Alien franchise don't have reproductive organs, so why does Call have breasts???

that lead to the famous interrogation that Ripley do to Lambert in Alien ...she ask if they did made sex ...since was probabily a fact that androids cant make sex . Btw if ive to go with a blonde i go with Kate Winslett and Elizabeth Shue ..i like them muuuuch more than theron ....if ive to skip on the other side well Guy Pearce is mine guys !!!

Because busty girls, even synthetic ones, sell box office tickets???? I don't think the company, or whomever, would have designed androids to have sexual desires, or at least any ability to act upon them. just imagine the nightmare it would cause, Data of Start trek, for example, lol. When he had his emotions chip installed, he was completely useless in any situation, lol. However he did have the parts to simulate 'human recreations' if I remember correctly, from one episode lol. And was programmed in al the arts of love, LOLOL

Thats always got me as that one, Synthetics in the Alien franchise don't have reproductive organs, so why does Call have breasts??? Those were created I believe strictly for "Johner"!

....all men in Prometheus is mine frantz!...mine u you hear!...lol... @ Snorkel Maybe she does not have nipples....like a mannequin ? Think the whole idea with Synthetics are so that they must seem 100% real....they have to blend in perfectly so that they can infiltrate..if u see something that resembles a Ken Or Barby doll showering next to u....no doubt u gonna get a bit suspicious!

created for Johner, lol Sparky, thats probably true

Kate Winslett and Elizabeth Shue versus Cheleze Theoron ???????????????????? OMG it isn't even CLOSE !!! They ain't in the same ballpark, they ain't in the same league, heck, they ain't even in the same Sport!!! [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v234/LT.HIGHTIMES/1a11charleze.jpg[/img]

I agree....a young Michelle Pfeiffer would compare well to Charlize tho IMO...and Guy Pearce does not compare to Michael and especially not to Logan!

Kate is a fantastic actress, very very pretty, and when I first saw the film The Reader, I fell hard for her, but for me there is not anywhere near as much an attraction there with her, she;s a bit of a heavy girl, haven't seen her lately but she's not a petite skinny lady she is more of Voluptuous Gal IMO. Shue for me doesn't even belong in that mix, and does 100% of nothing for me !!! But hey there's nothing wrong with it, attraction is much more than physical appearance. Have you ever sat down with someone you weren't that attracted to, but after talking to them for a while and getting up from the table it dawns on you that you might be In Love again? Attraction is a much deeper concept than physical appearances would have us think.

Yes well forget about the deeper concepts for a while...in terms of physical appearances....what do u think of Michelle Pfeiffer Spartacus...she falls into the slim skinny type...i am of cause referring to her in her younger days (she still looks amazing for her age tho)...but think back to "Witches of Eastwick", "Batman Returns", "Wolf"....still think she is one of the most gorgeous creatures that ever walked this planet...and a brilliant actress to boot!

Pfeiffer, for me, Plays in the exact same league that Theron does...except for one little tiny thing...No Best Actress Oscar, in fact, I donlt think she has EVER won one at all. Theron has it all, She is absolutely STUNNINGLY GORGEOUS, SMART AS WHIP, an extremely intelligent single woman, and a best actress Oscar winner but in a film that sets her apart from almost every single actress on earth, because to win that Oscar, she literally, had to become, the opposite of what she is...a MONSTER...inside and out !!! I love Pfieffer, Just love her, she can act, she is sexy, she is intelligent, but before I give her a key to my place she needs to win that best Actress Oscar!!! It's the credibility it would give here I think that is holding her back from Superstar status right now!!! But she's so damn close man, so damn close !!! I also think the Academy is watching for her to do something extraordinary so they can green light an award for her...she certainly desserves one just for her body of work up until now!!! and she's an Old School Hollywood veteran now !!! and one very hot {excuse the expression please no disrespect intended here} "MILF" !

,,,,she won an oscar for "fabulous baker boys" (i think?) and I believe she was nominated for "Love Field" and also "dangerous Liasons"...plus tuns of golden globes.. .u know that Sigourney was nominated for Aliens....but then that deaf woman won for "children of a lessor god"....not fair!...no disrespect...but how the fuck can u compete with a deaf actress....so for those of u who did not think Aliens was a masterpiece...bear in mind that the lead actress was nominated....u almost never see that in a sci-fi movie...almost never!...lol

Marlie Matlin was/is her name...I never liked her.

...u should check out "young adult"...Theron has been praised for her performance...many says it's her best performance since Monster....i have'nt seen it yet....but from the reviews i have read....she plays an extremely funny and almost also very disturbing character..... Yeah it's a crying shame that Weaver did not win for Aliens....tho being nominated is a huge honor already!

hey sparky I like em big! I'm sure you meant she deserves an award just for her 'body'....... lol

she is very sexy Winslett is IMO but not like Theron, to me at least...I find a bit skinnier than Winslett does it more for me...whatever, much more importantly, I was wrong, and whoever mentioned the Baker Boys or whatever but it was a Car Movie...and rang my bell because I remember now she won Best Supporting Actress for that one and the film stared maybe all three of the Bridges Boys I think. OR at least 2 of them, or maybe one, I am known to be bonehead sometimes...But the point is she won 1 Oscar for that film early on and none since, that's why I think she's close to getting one more...best Actress...but she needs the Perrrrrfect role and Cat Woman although it was "oooh sooo toit"{->spoken like "Goldmember"} was Not It !!!

Po2...get your mind out of the gutter...lol.....