Forum Topic

craigamore
MemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 6:32 PMDen of Geek posted this article.....very interesting look at things to this point...
[size=200][b]A closer look at Prometheus’ marketing campaign[/b][/size]
Ryan Lambie
With the next trailer for Prometheus only a few days away, Ryan takes a closer look at how Ridley Scott’s anticipated return to sci-fi has been sold so far…
Published on Mar 14, 2012
Over the past few days, much has been written about the marketing drive that built up to the release of John Carter. How the earliest trailer, released last July, didn’t have enough impact. How the name change confused people. How the posters failed to truly give a flavour of what the film was about.
I’m certainly not going to rake over all that again here, but the whole debate over the way John Carter has been packaged and sold so far has left me thinking quite a lot about the marketing campaign behind Ridley Scott’s forthcoming Prometheus. By comparison, the marketing of Scott’s ‘definitely not an alien prequel’ has been quite brilliant.
This isn’t to say that marketing has anything very much to do with the quality of either film. I was left utterly cold by John Carter’s posters and trailers, but thoroughly enjoyed the finished product. It’s possible, therefore, that Prometheus could prove to be the opposite: well-edited trailers and engaging posters used to flog an absolute pup of a movie. I sincerely hope this isn’t the case, but let’s face it, this sort of thing goes on all the time – do you remember how excited everybody was after they saw the first trailer for The Phantom Menace?
Irrespective of how Scott’s movie turns out, the marketing for it has, so far, been handled with a sense of sure-handed confidence. It helps, of course, that Prometheus has a big, easy-to-sell handle on it: Ridley Scott’s return to the sci-fi genre. A quick glance down the movie’s cast list reveals a solid roster of respected actors rather than A-list stars, but that hardly matters: here, Scott’s the star.
The director may be keen to distance his latest film from Alien, but movie buffs are unlikely to be dissuaded. And say what you will about Scott’s lesser films (and there are plenty of those, such as GI Jane and White Squall), his two sci-fi movies, Alien and Blade Runner, are among the most influential genre pictures ever made.
Safe in the knowledge that Scott’s project would get plenty of word-of-mouth publicity from Alien fans (its ‘Untitled Alien Prequel’ IMDb entry would ensure that on its own), little was seen or heard of the movie once its campaign officially kicked in last July. Twitter profiles and Facebook pages were hoisted under the project’s new banner, Prometheus, but little more was known, other than odd rumours or enigmatic statements from Scott about “Alien DNA” and gods from space.
The first official image to appear, which began circulating online in the wake of the 20111 San Diego Comic-Con, was almost anti-climactic: the vague outline of an astronaut, apparently suspended in space with what looked like the blurry after-images of a million bees buzzing around it.
Meanwhile, those lucky enough to actually be in attendance at the Comic-Con were treated to some preview footage. This proved to be another masterstroke: over the days that followed, genre fans everywhere were sharing their memories of what they’d seen. Charlize Theron doing press-ups in her birthday suit. Space ships. Some sort of weird green space gas.
What’s worth noting at this point is how successful Fox have been in crushing any attempts to divulge Prometheus’ secrets. Given just how easy it is to take still- or video-footage on a mobile phone these days, and how quickly things can be spoiled on the net, it’s surprising just how little has really leaked out. Sure, there’s the odd candid snap and (possibly fake) synopsis out there if you want to find them, but compare Prometheus’ production with, say, The Dark Knight Rises. Christopher Nolan’s final Batman movie may be the most anticipated film of 2012, but even with that in mind, the amount of leaked photos and trailers has been quite staggering.
In more recent months, Prometheus’ promo drive has begun in earnest. This kicked off with some tantalising images first published in Entertainment Weekly last November. These were, it has to be said, deceptively well chosen; hand picked to evoke an air of mystery rather than divulge anything tangible. Far from satisfying curiosity, they piqued it. Are those strange urns an early form of alien egg? If the three human explorers depicted in the images can breathe without a space helmet on, where exactly are they? And most pressingly, just what is that monolithic humanoid face in the background?
The posters released since have been no less enigmatic, offering up no more than a silhouette (presumably of Noomi Rapace's character) and the shadowy space face. So far, Prometheus has been a film being sold entirely on arresting images.
In December, the first official trailer arrived. The 30-second teasers that prefaced it in earlier weeks may have incited grumbles from some quarters, but there’s no denying that the trailer itself was a great one: eerie, tantalising, and packed with enough snapshots of odd, exciting things to get geeks like us excitedly reaching for the pause button every few seconds.
Last month, the Prometheus sales mission entered a new phase: a bit of viral marketing. A Weyland-Yutani website went live, which talks in blandly corporate terms about “building better worlds”. Best of all was the TED Talk video from corporation founder Sir Peter Weyland (played by Guy Pearce, mimicking the plumy tones of John Hurt), apparently beamed back in time from the year 2023. Weyland ominously relates the Greek myth of Prometheus, the titan who stole fire from the gods, and suffered for the act, before concluding, “We are the gods now.”
Once again, the viral marketing – whether it’s Weyland’s speech, or an intriguing high-res image that appeared a few weeks ago, apparently depicting a star map – tells us next to nothing about the finished film. And this, in these times of spoiler-filled trailers that appear to show us everything but the dying minutes of a movie, is quite unusual.
The only film I can think of that’s been bound in as much secrecy in recent years is Inception – and that movie was an original work, and not based in a pre-existing universe. Prometheus is keenly awaited by a fair number of sci-fi enthusiasts, and yet those involved in the film – Scott, the suits at Fox, and its marketing team – have resisted the temptation to plainly show too much.
The question, though, is whether Prometheus’ marketing has done enough to hook in those who are either indifferent to the Alien franchise, or are more casual towards their cinema going in general. Will Prometheus have the crossover appeal to make it a true summer blockbuster? At this juncture, it’s difficult to say.
It’s possible, too, that the next trailer, due to hit on Saturday, may completely reverse everything I’ve just written, and prove to be just as spoiler-filled and demystifying as so many other trailers we’ve seen in recent years. I suspect, however – and certainly hope – that it will not.
Because whether Prometheus proves to be an acclaimed hit or not, it feels like a film that’s being marketed by people who have a passion and understanding of what they’re selling – and their eagerness to keep so much under wraps merely makes us want to see the finished film all the more.
Thoughts?
14 Replies

Cypher
Co-AdminMemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 6:56 PMTreat em' mean and keep em' keen seems to be the order of the day ;-) Good find craigo. Now get back to detention :-P
[url=http://www.robocopmovie.net/][img]http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac89/snorkelbottom/NewRoboBanner.jpg[/img][/url]
"Is it dead this time?" "I dunno, poke it with this stick and see."

craigamore
MemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 7:08 PMMaybe I'll just shut my big mouth....
[img]http://www.broccolicity.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/BartSimpson16.gif[/img]

Cypher
Co-AdminMemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 7:38 PM[img]http://resource.mmgn.com/pwnage/user_9211_26YX66BD.jpg[/img]You do that :-P haha love Simpsons references :-D
"And so we enter......End game"
[url=http://www.robocopmovie.net/][img]http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac89/snorkelbottom/NewRoboBanner.jpg[/img][/url]
"Is it dead this time?" "I dunno, poke it with this stick and see."

IrishAndroid1
MemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 8:57 PMI agree with Frantz. The marketing, thus far, has been flawless. They've done nothing but keep us speculating with very little info to go on. I really hope that doesn't change come Saturday...I don"t want to know too much!!

craigamore
MemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 8:59 PMAgreed Irishandroid1.....It'll be cool, but I hope they keep most of the mystery, preferably all of it, close to the vest....just tease me again.

Jim100a100
MemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 9:31 PMgreat article, thanks for posting it.
I agree, the marketing has been phenomenal.

Mekja-Tek
MemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 9:39 PMKeeping everyone in the dark is the best marketing strategy. If all subsequent trailers fallow the same principle, June 8th may be a slow burner at the box office. But if the payoff is more than what we expected, the word of mouth aspect will be exponentially greater. I remember just grabbing friends and taking them to movies, they themselves ended up taking others to see.
The for some time now, is that this movie caters to a mature audience and its coming out during the family entertainment season. I see more and more kids being dropped off at mall and cineplexes as the new summer camp. Distributors are focused on the junior seat warmers flicks, more so than the edgy thriller.
The image of Shaw looking bloody and bruised would turn off most of the parents I know. The studios NEED to remember that 4-18 year old's are NOT THEIR CORE AUDIENCE for Prometheus, and act accordingly.
The one movies fits all development and marketing needs to stop. PROMETHEUS is for us. I know its being released in the summer, but its more a Ridley Scott film than a run of the mill summer flick. We require it to be dealt with as such.
Sorry for rambling! =)

craigamore
MemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 9:51 PM@Mekja-Tek....No need to apologize my friend - very well said and perfectly relevant.

OrganicLife
MemberOvomorphMar-15-2012 10:51 PMI expect that the trailer will be cool, but won't really show anything that we don't already know or suspect.
I mean the trailer is supposed to be 2:33, right? Well most trailers have 10-20 seconds of dead time, we'll reduce it to 5 seconds in the beginning and 5 in the end for arguments sake. So now we're onto the real story. Think about how much time you can burn with the whole lead up to the story, the "hey we found this stuff in Africa and its really weird" and then "it looks like it's from this planet and we should send a mission there". That could be almost a minute, and you might introduce a character or two or outline the protagonist's motivations but that's it, no more information. Then you're on into when they actually get to the planet, and the crew is so amazed by what they are finding, and it's real mysterious. Some nice, potentially intriguing shots of dark rooms and alien vistas, but nothing has gone wrong yet and we have no idea what the central conflict is going to be. Now we might be up to 1:30 or more. After this we get hints at what goes wrong, maybe some hints about how, and then it's on to the super dramatic music playing during a rapid montage of action shots and people screaming. Que title card, end of trailer.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if it plays out like this. You can explain a whole movie in 2:33, or you can cut it so it tells nothing at all. I think I know what choice they will make here.

Mekja-Tek
MemberOvomorphMar-16-2012 2:12 AM@OrganicLife
We are on the same page, lets hope Fox marketing dept can stick to this formula also. I like the idea of the trailer introducing the ancient discovery, prepping for the trip, revealing the crew, then as you said quick flashes of the crew in fear while never revealing much about their location and who or what they encounter. I love the quick glimpse of Janek on the control deck and the derelict in the sky.
As a modest freelance graphic designer, the visuals for this project is simple yet very effective. Some fool is destined to gripe, but they have to put things into context. The TED talk threw me for a loop with the floating cams. My theory is the Nostromo was a serious piece of a clunker, so if we had seen the crew arrive back home, we would realize things were a bit more advanced.
I am driving people nuts talking about this movie. I am pretty much ready to erase everything that came after 1979 from my memory! =)
Cheers

Ronster
MemberOvomorphMar-16-2012 4:40 AMsaw that yesterday was a good read and like the idea about the trailer looking forward to it tomorrow....

craigamore
MemberOvomorphMar-16-2012 7:57 AM'I am driving people nuts talking about this movie. I am pretty much ready to erase everything that came after 1979 from my memory!'
Right there with ya Mekja-Tek
Add A Reply
Join the discussion! Sign in using your Scified Account to add your say!
New to the site? You can create your own profile in seconds!
* Signing in also removes ads *