Cobra Hugger revelation ????

nope. and its also no coincidence that it has visual reminiscences of early cultures like egyptian IMO.. *hope NOT that this should implicate ´flying serpent´, that would be under Stargate-niveau..;)

Interesting observation. I tend to restrict my cross thinking of extraterrestrial items and human biology. But, I guess if your in keeping with Darwinism, it seems legit. Doesn't look like a male to me. Could be Arturian ("It doesn't matter if its Arturian baby!") But, I could be wrong. (Oops, I just let the next part of the franchise out of the bag)

I think the real question is why you think it does.

I also noticed this... [img]http://www.autumnskyburning.com/files/fh.jpg[/img]

I see the female genitalia when it's closed, but I'm not really seeing the male organ other than the body being snakelike, so I don't know if both are intended, just the first. High Priest was one of the first to see this before all of us, and he had explained it as cobra that looked like a "pussy", so that seems to be most people's first impression, although some have seen it to be more flower like.

If you look at the gif before the hugger opens.......the whole thing is a huge phallus

I think it's cute...

From a comparative anatomy standpoint, the clitoris and the penis are very similiar so to me, it does look a bit male at first, while also resembling the clitoris above the labia majora. I think it should be called the Vulvalien, but I'll probably getted voted down.

Okay, I thought you meant when it was open because the last time I looked my dick didn't have wings.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the clitoris become the penis when the fetus is in the room. The genetalia starts off female. Maybe someone here knows better than me about the facts on that.

SNAKES IN THE HEAD!!! Good reference to the Goa'uld from Stargate but this is beyond that and RickK that sells it for me it's either a close relative or a descendant of the familiar Hugger but who's to say that the forms we already know like the Facehugger, Chestburster, and Xeno are not some kind of aberration that's millions of years old and these new nasties are the next step?

It's a stretch.

No offence peeps but seeing this thing, this snake/leech/worm/eel, doesn't fill me with a lot of confidence, we have seen it way too many times before.

Yeah, I was hoping for something a little more creative too, but I think I was expecting too much. This isn't everything, so keep that in mind. @Alien DNA - Dude, just say "genitals"; "genitalia" sounds way too nerdy, especially when you're talking about girls.

Outlander that is exactly what I see....thank you

To be honest the more we see in the trailers the less I'm impressed and the more a line from Aliens keeps entering my head... "I've got a real bad feeling about this drop."

Its great how people judge a film from its trailer I don't think these creatures from from the planet, this may be a proto hugger in the sense its a first design for it before the Engineers redesign it to immobilize you totally and implant the larger creature

Space Jockstrap: I aggree with you that this might resemple the male and female organ. H. R. Giger was known for using sexual themes for his designs in the first Alien film. Whether this is designed by him I cannot say but if not I'm sure the other designers were willing to follow his example... If so I think this is rather genius.

I'm not judging the film from its trailer, but what little we know isn't as EPIC as Ridley keeps saying. I hope what we don't know makes up for that, but something tells me this film might divide fans even more than they already are. BTW - Proto-Hugger, [b][i]sigh[/i][/b]

Dude, genitals/ genitalia they pretty much mean the same shit. Genitals sounds more like a set of balls anyways. Thanks for the English lesson, but I'll pass. Besides we're on a forum for a Sci-Fi movie; I think the line between nerdy and not nerdy is a little bit blurry don't you think.