First offical reaction/review is online

Would you mind linking that?

Sorry, here ya go: [url=http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=59862]Your text to link here...[/url]

Haha I was just going to post this :p Reading this got me a little worried... I mean I am sure this movie will be great and that I will love it but it says we don't get any answers... Does that mean they will just find the temple and won't know anything about it the whole movie? And that would mean that there is no explanation giving about the urns and what they contain. I kinda find this hard to believe...

And now it starts... God please help us through this... I just want a fun movie.

Another vague review.... I don't think they saw it

Sounds like it could potientially be "Lost" in Space (pardon the pun) which would really, REALLY piss me off.

Hmmm...I'm actually kind of relieved it wasn't a glowing review. I'm anticipating this movie so much, I don't need to put any more pressure on it. Plus, he's Slovenian...so I'll take my chances.

They even got details incorrect

I'm going to take that review with a grain of salt...

Even if they did get the details right...what's with that objection to a [i]Monster[/i] that develops in less than half an hour? They did see 'Alien'.....right? They do know that the xeno develops from roughly the size of a weazel to something larger most human males in about the same amount of time, maybe a bit longer?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA, these people need a good spanking. Let's introduce them to a room full of Cobraliens... nice.

What details did he get incorrect? I've read movie reviews from big names (Ebert, Siegel, Stewart Kline, etc.) over the years where you could almost swear they saw a different film than then one I did, just from how they managed to mangle the plot when talking about the movie. EDIT: Ok I read it again and the only glaring thing I read was that he said it's "forty years" before Alien rather than "thirty years." That doesn't suprise me. See what I wrote above about movie reviewers.

Well he goes on about them changing in 30 mins, but that's fairly normal based on the other movies right, don't see a problem with that. I wouldn't take random magazine review seriously tbh it's one person opinion and who knows how much of a fan they are in the whole alien universe.

My ass is official too

Exactly Rawr....that's what I said....

Some wrong details: -40 years before 'Alien' -take's place "on moon of LV226" ... Off the top of my head

They got the planet name wrong...

Funny, isn't it BH?

i think this particular reviewer is stuck on seeing "Marines in Space" again, when they should have gone into the film without that baggage i don't trust reviews of films i want to see, whether they are positive or negative. look at the reviews ALIEN got when it was released way back in 1979, the reviews were more negative than positive. same goes for Blade Runner why would you let someone else tell you how something tastes or sounds, you need to see / taste it for yourself, that also applies to cinema just sayin'...

lol @ FW, nice!