Too Much Knowledge?

nin-uru
MemberOvomorphMay 25, 2012778 Views22 RepliesWithout writing a book of a post, I just want to mention briefly a few ideas that people can investigate on their own. They are simply ideas for people to think about regarding events over the last few decades in the Middle East.
Weapons of Mass Destruction. They were never 'found'. Was it a false reason to attack such as people seem to be led to believe? Or could Saddam have had knowledge or technology from the days of our creation. Bush reportedly 'removed' artifacts from the National Museum of Iraq after the 2003 invasion. Why?
There are oil reserves all over the world that could completely replace the need for using oil in that area of the Middle East but the struggle to maintain a stronghold there for oil remains. Why? But really.....why? Could it possibly be that those in power need a viable reason to remain in that area of the world to continue looking for what they are searching for? Evidence of who we are, who put us here, and any technology that is rumored to be left behind? The oil makes a great metaphoric oily substance.
Ancient knowledge has always been protected to the death. Modern day Iraq is where Sumer once stood. Through the Sumerians we obtained the 60 minute hour, 12 month year, the zodiac, the list goes on and on. They established the first written language and were therefore able to document what was happening on this planet during their time. Only around 200 people in the world can translate the tablets left behind. What other knowledge or technology did they leave behind that could potentially be dangerous in the wrong hands? I am not saying that the people who have it now are the right people to have it.
If the technology they left behind or the knowledge leading us to it could create life, that could be very dangerous in the wrong hands...perhaps any hands.
Saddam did have eight 'look-alikes' or 'body-doubles’.