Is this a problem?

Or it just shows that the artisans behind the artifact dated to 680 CW (whatever that means; I'm not sold on it meaning "Common Era") copied or otherwise derived from another, more ancient artifact, as cultures are wont to do, perhaps not understanding its original meaning. Greek sculpture -> Roman copies flood of Gilgamesh -> Noah and the ark ...and so on.

Interesting

Abiogenesis, I just read in another forum that in the movie this figure appears with "CE" in it; this one must be a tipo. Besides, it was found in Hawai. This is what Wikipedia has to say about the early occupation of these islands: "[i]The earliest habitation supported by archaeological evidence dates to as early as 300 CE, probably by Polynesian settlers from the Marquesas, followed by a second wave of migration from Raiatea and Bora Bora in the 11th century[/i]. " The environment of polinesian expansion over the Pacific was not very friendly to cultural transmissions like that; populations were small, and many things were forgotten. The culture of Easter Islands, for example, was very peculiar. Besides that, the very movie, thru Holloway´s mouth, says that these were "unrelated" civilizations _ and that was further proof that the "coincidence" was due to alien influence.