Alien: Earth and Alien: Romulus sequel news

Was the Deacon shown to us right from the beginning of the movie, on the Mural?

14117 Views195 Replies
Forum Topic

Svanya

AdminPraetorianJune 09, 2012
The Deacon's image was on the mural all along, staring us right in the face... [IMG]http://i47.tinypic.com/2m3pl42.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/w7kf1d.jpg[/IMG]

Wat

User Avatar
fox
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
The word "deacon" is derived from the Greek word diakonos (διάκονος),[1] which is a standard ancient Greek word meaning "servant", "waiting-man", "minister" or "messenger".[2] One commonly promulgated speculation as to its etymology is that it literally means 'through the dust', referring to the dust raised by the busy servant or messenger. THE BUSY SERVANT!
User Avatar
iapetus
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
ok, am going to try to elaborate my thoughts around that, many points to address... I noticed the deacon/mural similarity early on, just because people here already debated 2 interpretations of the mural, as either a full-body xeno-ish figure or a stylized facehugger-ish creature. From the beginning, I was only convinced by the 'xeno-ish' theory so watching the movie, and in the eventuality of a xeno-ish apparition linking to Alien, then I was expecting it to look precisely like that. Made sense. Now, regarding abordoli's theory. I think there is a lot of misunderstanding being carried on about Scott's declaration regaring the LV-426 Derelict. Too lazy to find the vid, but if you pay attention and I recall right, he only states that *the technology* is millions years old. Not that the ship built out of this technology has been crash-landed and lying there for Myears. Unfortunately people caught on that over-interpretation and peddled that info around. We know for a fact such ships have existed for Myears ('genesis' scene etc) but if you remove the rest from Scott's statement, there is no argument left giving any hint as to how long the LV-426 derelict has been there. Am also very very doubtfull regarding both the bioweapon and the "a la J.Park" stuff. Not straight off saying it can't be right, but to me it's built plain out of the blue with no support either. I think it's only carried by the recurring "Weyland Corp" project to turn it into a bioweapon and by Janek's statement that LV-223 is either a scientific or military outpost. To me, the idea of a "bioweapon" seems very far-off from the engineers plans. Seems they have plenty ways to annihilate us and/or other (a priori, less advanced than us) humanoids they seeded with the rest of the stuff available to them (#1-black goo). Plus, to wipe us out, I doubt turning earth into a "xeno-deacon" swarming paradise is the most effective way for them if they have any subsequent plans for it. Also, I think hints show that the LV-223 installations are not distinctly 'scientific' nor 'military' but more like a mix of both with 'worship-activities' like old time religion and ancient philosophers. Have no specific idea yet as to how/why the deacon is planned, if it really is. First, I am pretty convinced it is indeed a proto-xeno, not the other way around. Contrarily to abordoli's theory, it is slightly backed by Scott/Lindelof/SFX artist's statements in interviews. They said it was tying into Alien and also how the creatures share some design DNA with Alien but more along how it could/would evolve into the facehugger/chestburster/xeno than exactly featuring these. All in all, even if they are counting on the fanbase, I think the general audience wouldn't be able to understand/think about it at all the other way around. And we shouldn't forget the general audience is also part of what the movie is aiming at, overall. As an evolutionary biologist, I was quite interested in how the engineers could seed life in the entire galaxy and control the fact that humanoid life-forms will evolve on each of these planets, at some point. Well, predictably, it wasn't explained. So what we are left with is that engineers can probably program one evolutionary pathway into their biotech so that the evolution of an relatively precise life-form can be somewhat planned. I think a similar thing is involved for the deacon, which explains why it was on the mural already. But the creature also is influenced by it's previous hosts, as designers explained they made it somewhat more feminine to recall Shaw, and evocative of the clumsiness of a foal to give it a weak but terrifying and beautiful aspect. very long post already, will do another tomorrow if more things come to mind.
User Avatar
fox
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
Give me the sequel.... NOOOW - or just a tease for it :D
User Avatar
Engineering
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
@iaeptus...I really don't think RS meant what you think he meant. I think when he said that he was talking about why the SJ was fosselized and that it had been sitting there for a long time. I don't think he was talking about the ships tech. Why would he mention the age of tech when he was talking about how old the SJ had been sitting there? Makes no sense. And the spacecraft at the beginning was not the same as the jugg.
[IMG]http://i1161.photobucket.com/albums/q507/Engineering211/sig2.jpg[/IMG]
User Avatar
sukkal
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
Abordoli — I kind of like your theory about the Deacon being an [u]innovation[/u], however... Cuddles is REALLY inefficient compared to the traditional facehugger. Would have to eat a ton of something to grow that big. Adds an extra step (host)... The eusocial xenos with one hugger-laying Queen is a more efficient species. There is one archetype hugger and genetic diversity comes from the chestburster inheriting DNA from the animal/mammal host. I do think that the "green crystal" (in Jurassic Park "amber" fashion) may contain something that is worshipped/revered because it started the whole thing. That item may be something that the Engineers found somewhere else entirely. More than a "prophecy" it may simply be that to produce the Deacon, a full cycle of goo ››› sperm (male (Charlie)) + egg (female (Elizabeth)) ››› Cuddles ››› Engineer host was needed. But, we can guess ’til we're blue in the face, because 3 of the sarcophagi clearly featured burst chests. That's an additional mystery.
User Avatar
Gahlaktus
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
Moreover, if that is the Deacon on the wall mural several more additional things have to be true: 1) David knew the life cycle of the Deacon and its requirements for both conception and birth. He would have acquired this info from inscriptions on the walls of the facility. Therefore his behavior was deliberate, making more meaningful his inquiries of Shaw regarding her recent sexual life with Holloway, and explaining his deliberate inspection of her for evidence of an "alien" pregnancy. 2 )The engineers had abducted human hosts previously, conducted experiments, and understood the Deacon's etiology, perfectly. 3) Then a human host is responsible for the deaths of all the engineers on LV 223. Perhaps this is the meaning of the viral citation of Nietzsche's Doctrine of Eternal Recurrence, or as BSG would put it : all of this has happened before, all of this will happen again. 4) The engineers are likely infertile or require other hosts for reproduction. It is also possible that the wall mural doesn't represent the Deacon, but the Deacon resulted as a consequence of an experiment gone wrong. In any event, the first stage of that 'experiment gone wrong' would have required human hosts. These are sufficient reasons for the engineers to eliminate humans, humans can reproduce the perfect bio-weapon that will kill off the engineers : "Don't all children want their parents to die?' It is also obvious that the engineers can't complete this life cycle without human intervention. Well, there you have it: "Diiiie!!"
User Avatar
iapetus
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
Hi again guys actually I did pay specific attention to that when the video was out, precisely because right then I figured people were already hearing what they wanted to hear. In the end I fought my lazyness and found the video that started this all 'the derelict was there for millions of years' craze back then. The general part about that is from ~5:30 to ~7mn and at no time is he talking about how long the derelict has sat there. He mentions it crashed at some point but after that, him mentionning millions of year is a distinct thing and only regarding the age of the technology (crash landed [blablabla...] distress signals are necessary Myears in the past or My in the future [...] technology that is Myears old). youtu.be/NnAiIqWsyAo Also yes, I know the saucer ship is not the same, but it does not invalidate what I say, considering what Scott was talking about and I was addressing is technology VS the time the LV-426 Derelict rested there. I wouldn't pay too much attention to the term "fossilized" cause fossilisation is turning into non-organic compounds which doesn't occur that way. I think it's just abusive language when they actually mean "mummified" which also look more like what we see in Alien. All in all, sorry to insist but realize how much people have jumped into that misunderstanding, spread the word and convinced themselves they were right by making up facts, just because it suited their theory. Try not doing that people, stick to what we have only, otherwise it's just a weird game of constantly making up and reviving crazy theories.
User Avatar
abordoli
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
@fox, iapetus, Engineering, sukkal: All greats posts with some really good information based on observations, etc. I look forward to many months of debate (and even changing and re-canting my own theories) between now and Prometheus 2 when, hopefully, we'll get some more answers to the multitude of new questions. Regarding the inefficient "body-hugger" that produces a deacon+(assumed egg). Maybe this "body-hugger" is a "kick-starter" stage that occurs only when a host (Holloway) is directly infected and impregnates the next host (Shaw) which then produces this unique "body-hugger" stage. Then afterwards, no more "body-huggers", just "deacons" and "deacon-face-huggers". It's like we're being shown a part of the lifecycle that we have never seen before. Just like what they did in Aliens with the queen. I'm going to hang on a little bit longer to my "egg/face-hugger/ancient-xeno" pre-dates the "urn/host1/[host2(if Host 1 wasn't female)]/body-hugger/deacon+egg/deacon-face-hugger/deacon" theory for three simple reasons (prove all 3 wrong and I'll switch back over; of course this all hinges on whether or not the LV-426 is older than 2000 years even if it isn't 1 million years old): 1) The pilot's suit was fossilized into his chair with his suit hollow because the engineer inside was dust lying in the boots. This takes a long time to happen. 2) The eggs in the cargo-bay hold (which are bio-weapons because Ridley stated so in a fairly recent interview; I can find the video link if need be) are in a stasis hibernation mode and it has been said somewhere (I forget where I heard it) that the eggs can hibernate as long as necessary surviving in the most inhospitable environments. 3) The Juggernaut on LV-426 is an older model than the Juggernauts we see on LV-223. The new models come with 4 stasis modules and a console and chair. The old model was ancient and even had a different way to access the bridge as we see in the newer model. These points, and even more, make it such that the Juggernaut on LV-426 is vastly older than the Juggernauts on LV-223. Thus the style of cargo on LV-426 (bio-weaponoid-eggs) are older than the style of cargo on the Juggernauts on LV-223 (urns that can be launched, and shatter like synthetic eggs complete with "yolk" (the thing David put on his finger to infect Holloway) and "white" (the mutanogenic, primordial "black-goo"). Thus, the "egg/face-hugger/ancient-xeno" pre-dates the "urn/host1/[host2(if Host 1 wasn't female)]/body-hugger/deacon+egg/deacon-face-hugger/deacon". This is too complex for general audiences to grasp? Maybe in the 50s. This is 2012. Audiences are smarter.....though not by much.. ; )
User Avatar
CrazyDave55811
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
@[b]Svanya[/b] Good point. Maybe Fox wasn't smart to show the mural in the trailers....because, now having seen the movie, it truly was "given away". Blame Fox? Or blame the mainstream movie-going community who requires to be spoon-fed and to see everything in order to understand? @[b]Shambhala[/b] My friend is wondering if we'll see the Deacon in Aliens: Colonial Marines.....because Gearbox Software said that Colonial Marines will have some ties with Prometheus. I imagine the Deacon will be a taller creature, though I don't know how much more formidable, let alone if it multiplied.
User Avatar
abordoli
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
[i]All in all, sorry to insist but realize how much people have jumped into that misunderstanding, spread the word and convinced themselves they were right by making up facts, just because it suited their theory. Try not doing that people, stick to what we have only, otherwise it's just a weird game of constantly making up and reviving crazy theories.[/i] Hold on now. Let's have the debate first, OK?...LOL...I haven't declared anyone else as having "crazy theories". Let's debate, present the evidence and we can all chime in as to what we believe...or something completely different....Hey, even I might swap sides.....LOL. I just watched the "Ridley Scott talks Prometheus with Geoff Boucher" again for like the tenth time and also paid extra special close attention to Ridley's words. English is my native language of 40 years and tone, inflections and emphasis have a lot to do with what the meaning of what is being said (as it does in ALL languages). So I'll leave that at that.....Each member will have to decide what they feel he is trying to say. If the derelict juggernaut on LV-426 was manufactured 1 million years and has still been running within the last 2,000 years then THAT's the manufacturer that I want making my next vehicle.... ; )
User Avatar
CrazyDave55811
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
@[b]abordoli[/b] At first I thought that was, like, the Engineer's heart.....but then it hit me that it might be placenta. I'm no expert on things like this but I think placenta is still attached along with the umbilical cord in a newborn. The placenta is where the unborn would get its food I think. The part that confused me was that it was throbbing, or pumping like a heart, hence my first belief that it was the Engineer's heart. I tried Googling placentas and I found images tied to one "I ate my baby's placenta," and stopped there. )x
User Avatar
Spartacus
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
[b]"DEACON"[/b]...Hey He plays drums for Queen...Yup, I see the resemblance now !!! [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v234/LT.HIGHTIMES/1a1Deacon1.jpg[/img]
User Avatar
Gahlaktus
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
Somewhere, Ridley said that the Alien space jockey belonged to an alternate group of engineers who departed LV 223 about 100 years before the events of Prometheus. So, that would make for an entirely different timeline than conjecture will allow for the Deacon to be the "proto-xeno." Moreover, if, As Svanya suggests, the wall mural portrays the Deacon, that can only mean that the incubation of the Deacon requires a human female as its host. Furthermore, she will have to be "impregnated", so to say, with the sperm of a human male, who, in turn, has been infected with mutagens from black goo. If that too, is true, then we understand why the engineers were headed to earth, either to acquire hosts or to eliminate the species that could act as the perfect host for the perfect bio-weapon.
User Avatar
shambs
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
The Juggernaut has a cargo hold with a lot of Urns [img]http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u498/protoxeno86/prometheusV_screencap30.jpg[/img] The Juggernaut Derelict is full of eggs [img]http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u498/protoxeno86/eggchamber.jpg[/img] and what is the risk of that, well... [img]http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u498/protoxeno86/hr_giger_facehuggerArte.jpg[/img] And in Prometheus we see that the engineers were killed by something, Nevertheless I still believe that the Urns are an updated version of the biological weapon.
User Avatar
sick1
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
Found this online. [IMG]http://i318.photobucket.com/albums/mm427/luckybill13/alien.jpg[/IMG]
User Avatar
shambs
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
[img]http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u498/protoxeno86/prometheus___alien_by_dynamorobo-d52xjuf.jpg[/img]
User Avatar
Svanya
Group: Admin
Rank: Praetorian
View Profile
@CrazyDave55811; Exactly, I think it's a placenta. Like I said to Abordoli, some newly birthed/hatched fish and sharks continue to feed off their placental yolk for a few hours/days. As for the SJ culture this guy nailed it on the head I think; (Ridley Scott used this mythology for the SJ)-->[url=http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/7436]PROMETHEUS Explained! (Sumerian)[/url]

Wat

User Avatar
shambs
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
@Gahlaktus Interesting thoughts and in fact... What have in common "LV-223" with "LV-426"? Well, in two moons we have two juggernauts abandoned and their Space Jockeys pilots dead (ok, there are a few variations, but anyway) and history repeats in terms of the outcome. and the quote: The wall mural portrays the Deacon, that can only mean that the incubation of the Deacon requires a human female as its host. Furthermore, she will have to be "impregnated", so to say, with the sperm of a human male, who, in turn, has been infected with mutagens from black goo. Well here's a little problem, because the Xenomorph can be impregnated in men and women.. So if Deacon can only be the result of a Trilobite in the womb of a woman...well...then the Deacon would be an ancestor of the Xenomorph and not an updated version. @CrazyDave55811, Yeah, Colonial Marines will be an epic game, and I wonder ... what will be the link with Prometheus? Urns, black goo, Cuddles Trilobite or the Deacon. I imagine a Deacon can reach the size of an Engineer or even bigger, maybe like a Queen (just speculating of course :p).
User Avatar
NCC 1701
Veteran Member
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
you called it
User Avatar
Svanya
Group: Admin
Rank: Praetorian
View Profile
@Shambhala; IF it does turn into a Queen, maybe the initial "impregnation" by a male and female host would explain why only "she" is fertile and can lay eggs (may not even be female, but a combo). But then to have that theory work, you would need a pairing, either forced or sacrificial, who knows.

Wat

Join the discussion!



Recently Active Forums
Alien
AlienDiscuss all things Alien here
Alien: Earth Series
Alien: Earth SeriesDiscuss the Alien FX TV series here!
Alien: Covenant
Alien: CovenantDiscuss the Prometheus Sequel, Alien: Covenant
Alien 5 Movie
Alien 5 MovieDiscuss Neill Blomkamps’s vision for Alien 5 here
New Forum Topics
Hot Forum Topics
Highest Forum Ranks Unlocked
Svanya
Svanya » Praetorian
89% To Next Rank
ninXeno426
ninXeno426 » Praetorian
62% To Next Rank
Thoughts_Dreams
Thoughts_Dreams » Neomorph
88% To Next Rank
Neomorph
Neomorph » Chestburster
94% To Next Rank
cuponator3000
cuponator3000 » Chestburster
84% To Next Rank
Latest Media
Community Stats
This Alien Movie Universe community is part of the Scified network. Scified hosts a network of online fan-site communities containing 406,444 posts by 48,459 members (23 are online now). The Alien Forum is the most recently active forum. The latest Forum topic added was: Episode 4 Observation Spoiler Discussion
VIPWhat are VIP?AdminModeratorSpecial TitleMember
Join the discussion!
Please sign in to access your profile features!
(Signing in also removes ads!)



Forgot Password?
Scified Website LogoYour sci-fi community, old-school & modern
Hosted Fansites
AlienFansite
GodzillaFansite
PredatorFansite
Main Menu
Community
Sci-Fi Movies
Help & Info
+

Sign In to contribute!