
ninXeno426
MemberPraetorianAugust 13, 2017To support the other topic i just launched,I'd like to more directly discuss what is perhaps the most divisive aspect between James Cameron's and Ridley Scott's Vision for Alien,the queen xenomorph vs eggmorphing.While the queen xenomorph is more universally recognized by fans as part of the xenomorph life cycle,some dislike the "normalization "of the xenomorph,making them more akin to an insect colony("Bee's man,bee's have hives")as to where the original concept was to have the xenomorph morph a human host into an egg.Also worth noting back in 1986 when Aliens originally released,egg morphing was practically unknown to the world,making the queen so much easier to accept.Only since has eggmorphing become better known among fans,leading some to unfairly criticize James Cameron of "normalizing" the xenomorph life cycle.Also worth noting that Between Prometheus and Alien Covenant,that both the queen and egg morphing are being rendered obsolete in favor of the Black goo contagion.Just another example of visions from these two directors be received rather differently from fans.And with Prometheus And Alien Covenant,does this argument have any validity anymore?
Nothing the God of biomechanics wouldn't let you in heaven for