Chestburster in Prometheus?

@casey that is why the Alien design is so successful...subliminally the design is very sexual and seems to resonate with our subconscious in a terrifying and perverted way

@ Casey That was one of the primary delivery methods the original writers worked into getting the Alien into the human. They wanted the embryo being implanted to be like forced oral sodomy. They felt it lended uncomfortable tension to the movie, especially for heterosexual men.

Is'nt that Shaw who looks like she's'had a C-section.

I don't think he would have chosen to do a whole new movie with new aliens and a different story if he was okay with using face huggers and chestbursters as monsters again. I think he would have made the direct prequel to alien instead of this one.

Actually, if you look really close....as it turns you get a glimpse of what could be 2 little arms. Im betting my share that its a chestburtser. In 3 months i can say.....i told you so lol.

Maybe it's a Chestburster but i doubt that i mean maybe it will show up in the movie and if you look close you will notice it's Shaw and her stomach is open looking like she was cut open and they took that thing out instead of it killing her i guess Remember what i always say i have no idea By the way didn't this get discussed multiple times on the forums i remember that

I thought this was resolved allready. It's been C-sectioned out of Shaw and it's clearly still attached to her by its umbilical cord. It's hasn't got a tail, it's got several tentacles. It's NOT a chestburster, it's some new thing we haven't seen before.

Great thread.......looks to me like the autodoc just excised a very pissed-off trouser-snake from her uterus.......:o.... But seriously, I've read posts where people attempt to deny the twisted psychosexual [i][b]over[/b]tones[/i] of "Alien." Whatever.......... I think we're definitely in for a freak-show of beautifully shot, brilliantly realized, squirm in your seat, sci-fi horror. Scott hasn't shied away from [i]raising[/i] expectations for this movie, and I have a feeling that his confidence [i]isn't[/i] misplaced.

The topic that just won't die. It's something that got c-sectioned out of her. It's not a chestburster. Man, I hope they stay away from everything xeno related. New monsters and space jockeys. Nothing related to alien directly.

Chestbursters burst through the chest, hence the name. This thing is surgically removed through the abdomen, so its more likely to be a parasite with multiple tails - which quickly grows big amd slams one of its tails against the window of the door Shaw is looking through in the Imax trailer

Me too Shane. The facehugger/chestburster/xeno is very much been there, done that.

Wrong. So so wrong.

This is 30 years before Alien......Riddles himself said that. So really there can only be 3 creatures......the chestburster, the alien, and the space jockey. Unless evolution takes an incredible fast forward in 30 years then suddenly becomes dormant. We know for sure that this movie really is going to lead to Alien, even if it isnt a direct prequel, its still a prequel all the same. We know the lifecycle. This is just about how it all began, Sir Riddles knows we all need to know how it all began, so that we know it didnt involve any Predators, which in my view would be an insult to Gigers work. Which incidently.....the original SJ ship had bones for walls (keep that in mind i say to myself). Anyway.....i dont think there will be new creatures.....just the origins of the ones we all know and love. Or else where did they go in 30 years. Obviously it has to be the same SJ ship waiting to be discovered by the Nostromo crew. Anyway, in the novel they still only know about a signal.....not a Xenomorph.....id still love to know how ASH knew a creature exsisted when the company are only supposed to know about a signal. How did ASH know it could be matched only by its own hostility.....who saw this happen? Not the company, they just know about a signal......this in my opinion is where Prometheus comes into it....i reckon somebody makes it back to Earth to tell the tale, we assume everyone dies because the derelict is left there decaying for 30 years with a hold full of jack-in-the-boxes. Ive lost my original line of enquiry so im going to bed. By the way, ive built a full size Xenomorph head, ive molded it and will be producing a plastic copy........any more than that im keeping under wraps so im not seen as advertising lol.

It's not a chestburster. Why does everyone use the same image. If you grab the new trailer off apple in HD and pause it you get a clear shot of it. The thing is smooth and featureless except for two tentacles or legs.

AMAZING SPOT DUUUUUDE !!!! BEST ONE SO FAR- NOW IM EXCITED THERE WILL BE COOL SHIT LIKE THIS IN THE FILM! CANT WAIT TO SEE WHAT IT GROWS INTO! HA NOT AN ALIEN PRQUEL MY FUCKING ARSE! WELL DONE MATE

I maybe wrong but is there a shape of a person to the left head end? seems that an arm is moving, in what looks like a thick cuffed jacket of some sort ? are people over seeing this ?

lol @ Diesektor... exactly my thoughts...no not a prequel except for oh, the space jockey, LV-426, xenomorphs, Weyland, the year, derelict ship nope, nothing like a prequel, nothing to see here move along folks... it's actually the next Rambo movie I've heard

Already did this topic.... [url=http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/2126]http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/2126[/url]

I hate to be that guy on the threads but a chestburster would imply it was coming out of the humans chest. And imo, it doesnt look like a chestburster, it looks like something else entirely. It looks connected somehow around the abdomen. Looks bloody too. Rough day indeed.

[img][URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/138/326201260205pm.jpg/][IMG=http://imageshack.us/a/img138/5640/326201260205pm.jpg][/IMG][/URL][/img]