Post EVERY fault with this movie

Leebalien1980
MemberOvomorphJune 05, 20122678 Views35 Replieseveryone who's seen Prometheus please post all the problems and complaints you have with it here
June 05, 2012
maybe do this after the America has seen it.
This weekend is gonna be interesting to say the least.
Maybe some have re-evaluated their expectations, and will have an enjoyable time.
If for the Visuals alone, thats why i don't mind seeing it again.
The missus will love the 3-D aspect.
but yeah, i think you should hold off.....
June 05, 2012
Leebalien1980
I have noticed the majority of your posts are how you are displeased with Prometheus, and I'm wondering why you are so adamant about showing your displeasure. If I don't like the film I will be disappointed also, but I don't know if I'd be making post after post about my experience.
I'm not arguing and you have a right to say you don't like it all you want, I'm just curious if it was really that disappointing to you, did it really let you down to such a low? I'm concerned it could do the same for me so I was just asking. Also what would you have liked to see different that could have made it a better movie?
June 05, 2012
Ok let me start:
The CGI engineers' faces looked unrealistic
The stupid cartoony burp sound effect the engineer makes
The flying saucer
The stupid concept of the engineers having to drink that crap to make other species
The way it was filmed
The way the ship was introduced
No back story on Earth
Guy Pearce's ridiculous looking makeup
The size of space jockeys was way too small
Ripping David's head off without saying a word?
“Father.”!?!?!?
“Are you a robot?”!?!?!?
The black liquid which could do anything the writers wanted it too
Again, the stupid way it was filmed
The quick editing
No tension
Characters make stupid decisions
Boring and predictable main characters aside from David
Unnecessary beginning of time sequence on Earth
Fifield's awful lines and acting
The scottish woman's acting was equally as bad
THE ENGINEER'S FACE WHEN THEY PUMPED ELECTRICITY INTO IT HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The way Shaw can run after a bloody C section
How David functions with his head off when Ash died in Alien
How the engineer managed to get to Shaw in 30 seconds after he crashed his plane
Stupidity of Fifield and Milburn getting lost
Stupidity of captain making a joke of them
The rip off of Alien Vs Predator with the cave markings
Once again, the filming and editing
Somehow an android is overwhelmed by emotion and infects a crew member for this reason, what the hell?!
“God does not build in straight lines.” ?!?!?!?!
“This is the sweetest air I have ever tasted”
“It's christmas and I want to open my presents.”
The film managed to move from christmas to new years day when the events of the film definitely took place over only 2 days.
No focus on the crew's emotions after their 2 years in hypersleep
Terrible 3D conversion on a shot of the planet, shooting star going across the screen looks blatantly 2D
Why does Shaw dream in third person!?
The engineer falling and getting his head cut off by the door was hilarious.
June 05, 2012
What's wrong with this film? Well, almost everything. I do not want to discount visual effects and in general the technical side of it, but as to the plot....nothing holds. The story telling is almost not there. Nothing is clear, nothing is explained, nothing makes sense. Characters don't know why they went on the expedition in the first place, they have no roles ascribed to them, they behave recklessly, e.g. the captain leaves the ship, even though he is the main person who knows how to operate it, and goes on a trip to the caves that may be potentially dangerous, and indeed is!, or opts for a shag and leaves the base completely unattended during the night!!! Ridiculous. I felt that the film creators wanted to elaborate on very interesting questions but failed to invent any coherent ideology or underpinning philosophy.
As to the entertainments it was rather poor as well, the whole film was rather silly in places and did not hold my attention. I felt no attachment to characters, and didn't care when they were dying because they were not developed enough and I didn't even care about Charlize Theron. All actors had rather appalling task in front of them because how do you act if your character is slimly not there?!, with the exception of Michael Fassbender whose character was the most interesting and developed, but his talking head was rather silly as well.
Out of 10, I would give it weak 4. It was also irritating that the whole film did not manage to contribute anything to the story and various plots were kept loose just in a hope for a squeal. Shame on directors and producers for carrying only about the revenue, as it seems!!! The whole film sucks a
big time.
June 05, 2012
Smiles softly, all these faults make it sound like an exceptional installment of LEXX. Shaw is definately not as sensuous as Xev Belringer, but she is carrying around a talking head like 790. I guess that would make Holloway into Kai the undead assasscin, but hmmmm Vickers definitely would not be Stanley Tweedle.
June 05, 2012
LEebalien1980 you joined TODAY and you already have already started
6 THREADS bashing the movie .... you think we are idiots ??
Trolling clone .
June 05, 2012
Folks go on about the whole haters thing but it's for real now the movie has been released and soon in the USA it will be revealed how much of a joke this movie really is! And I can bet it won't be long before YouTube will be full of crap reviews, jokes and parodies.
June 05, 2012
....so much hatred for this film...wow!...the site is called Prometheus....why even come here if you hated the movie so much....i don't mind a negative review....but geez stop the poison already....why not rather ask what was right with the movie....post everything you liked about it?
I wanne go and enjoy this movie but some people who saw it are making it so hard.....should'nt this site be for people who wants to see it and people who'm are actually fans of the movie.....?
Go away....Create your own site....you can call it "we hate Prometheus.com!...and if i really hate the movie that badly after seeing it....then i will join that site!
June 05, 2012
Leebalien1980 ...38000 people on rotten tomatoes have graded the movie...87% of them liked it ... that count a bit more than you .
June 05, 2012
...yes and the critics on RT is giving it a 79....which is not bad for a sci-fi....in fact it's a very good score ...taking into consideration that most of those critics are not easily impressed....at least they are very objective...they say what they liked and what they disliked about the movie....even the rotten reviews had some redeeming commentary....
I have seen my fare share of crap movies....but if you look carefully their is always at least one little redeeming feature....!!...why not mention it?
June 05, 2012
I can't think of anything that isn't easily explained, but one thing I noticed is that David's head didn't move from where it fell, even after a massive collision and the juggernaut tumbles to the planet.
Explanation: Really good artificial grav, but its weird to think that during all that mayhem nothing inside the ship is disturbed.
June 05, 2012
Hi, I just wanted to say this because I've read so many wrong statements from believers who keep defending this movie. It is disgruntled, confusing and it just downright sucks. Now, if it really was a stand-alone movie, that would be fine. But it also proceeds to take an elaborate dump all over the Alien(s) movies in the process. I truly wish I hadn't seen it.
There are, at least, 50 confirmed plot errors/continuity errors, discrepancy's even when looking at it as a stand-alone film, which we shall do (but only theoretically because when you borrow the original Alien trailer and its music for your own trailer, insert countless tongue-in-cheek references and quotations to/of the Alien(s) movies, set your movie in the same universe but make up a weird inconsistent time frame to justify it, tamper with the legacy of the Space Jockey and the race of the xenomorphs, you are not in fact making a stand alone movie).
"Hey it is on a different planet guys" isn't going to save this movie from total failure.
Then there's the pseudo-intellectual/philosophical sub plot. Completely ridiculous: either you work out your sub plot or you don't insert it in the first place: this is a half attempt at it and just adds useless dialogue and premisses.
Then there's the poor characters, with only David being remotely interesting. The others have no part in the actual movie, no development or don't invoke sympathy: I was wishing all of them to die because they are useless and don't react remotely realistic to anything going on. They didn't even have any lines lol.
The premise on which the movie was based is ridiculous: hey don't come visit our chemical weapons plant which is located NEAR our home planet, but in the meantime (33.000 years) we will be breeding aliens to come kill your planet (a conclusion made by a character that didn't even leave the mother ship after being on the alien planet for about 6 hours examining 1% of its surface).
Just admit it believers, this movie is nothing but pretty pictures of Iceland. The plot matter may be wider than Aliens, but it's disjointed, childish, confusing and incomplete. I personally think Scott is ashamed of this movie.
June 05, 2012
50+ was an exaggeration (not even Terminator III had that many). But there's quite a few, more than average at least.
Check the internet, many of people are keeping lists.
There's really so many that I don't even feel compelled to defend myself here lol, you're kidding yourself if you think the plot is consistent.
June 05, 2012
No need to defend yourself JDOG. I'm just interested (thats why I'm reading this thread) Whats your (least)favorite top five?
June 05, 2012
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to post spoilers here. But first off, as I said, the premise of even going to LV-223 is ridiculous.
I see people pointing out the Birth of Christ here and all, that's so far fetched. But basically, the whole "it's an invitation, not a map, no wait it's a warning not a map"...why would Prometheus figure, or the SJ race leave warning signs to an underdeveloped world not to go near there super secret Chemical Weapons plant, on which they, according to the timeframe presented, spent 33.000 years developing bio-weapons to destroy that creation in the first place? Honestly? I'm sure if you think long and hard you can come up with something, but honestly that's just a weak premise.
Second, there's the 100% DNA match issue and how quickly the characters dismissed the entire Darwinistic theory. Chimps have 97% different DNA in a timeframe that's literally 1/10.000th of that between Prometheus and man. And they look totally different. And there's plenty of bio-chemical faults with that theory.
Third, there's the issue of the first "kill-scene": there are so many inconcistencies there are simply to many to list (from straight-forward ones like Buggies/vehicles disappearing randomly, to the Geologist with the 3D mapping device being the first and only one to get lost but even communicating with the mothership from a position from which the rest of the crew got out in seconds: they had plenty of means and time to leave that obviously hostile cave/spacecraft before the storm struck: in the plot they blame it on the negligent captain treating his crew like dirt. The same captain that later sacrifices himself and his buddies in total display of selfishness and morality. The same captain who discovers the entire plot without even leaving his ship, except to kill a zombie (lol).
The SJ at the end isn't wearing a mask, and the alien inside the ship is completely ignored/forgotten. There's no reaction to what happens to Noomy (??)'s pregnancy/abortion, not even she herself feels any contempt towards David, despite him confessing. He also killed her boyfriend mind you? All the characters behave irrational and are furthermore really thin.
Then there's the hole sequence with the holograms 'running away' from something, their place of death is highly weird, look it up.
Then the sequence with the flute/Synthesizer: 'Close Encounters of the Third kind any one?"
Then there's the captain failing to run away from the falling ship and getting squashed: the same captain that was doing push-ups after cryo-genic sleep whilst everyone else was throwing up. Main character manages to escape even with her belly just sewn closed.
And then there are plenty of 'weird' things again for which I'm sure these believers will find a 'logical' or reasonable explanation. It simply doesn't cut it.
June 05, 2012
My only complaint with the film: it was just too short....
I've read a lot of complaints about plot holes.. but in my experience from seeing the film with friends.... it just lead to a lot of discussion. Don't think I've talked so much about a film after watching it in a long time.
Yes the film leaves you with more questions than answers, but this has created a lot conversation with others who have seen the film (and loved it btw).
Yes, character development seemed lacking with the team, but to fit everything in to that 2hrs, choices had to be made. I would have loved it if it was 3hrs long, but I get the feeling I still would have had lots of questions even after 3hrs.
I also think the film deserves a 2nd viewing (as there was so much going on) and will see it again this week.
Enjoy the film for what it is..... a bloody good film..
June 05, 2012
JDOG joined today too ... and is already very active bashing the movie ...
btw ...
"spent 33.000 years developing bio-weapons to destroy that creation in the first place?" why ? when ? where ?? There is something in the movie that tell you that ?? Its like you say of alien " there is a turd on a chair that gave birth of an alien to kill the first crew that enter !!"
"Second, there's the 100% DNA match issue and how quickly the characters dismissed the entire Darwinistic theory." ...if you see someone almost totally human that was alive and advanced alot of time before we were born ...well the connection that delete darwinism is pretty fast ( we descend from them and not from monkeys )
""Third, there's the issue of the first "kill-scene": there are so many inconcistencies there are simply to many to list"" 3d mapping was not yet ready when they leave the temple , btw is of course a excuse to make something bad happen , there is in all sci fi and you dont have to remove your hairs for that ....
""Then there's the captain failing to run away from the falling ship and getting squashed"" ...its a matter of direction ...not of phisical shape .
btw when you watch a movie is ridicolous to waste time finding the "weird things " its really missing the whole idea to follow details .