Ridley Scott Ends 33+ year debate over Derelict & Eggs !

Spartacus
MemberOvomorphApril 25, 20123405 Views76 Replies[url=http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/3872]33YearQuestionends[/url]
please hit the link above it will take you to the thread "NightRiderLoveProvider" made today and then click on his link at the top or copy and paste it to see the interview and see and hear the reveal about halfway though it.
In the interview link above from that thread earlier today Ridley Scott ended a 33+ year debate on how the eggs got below the Derelict and How the Jockey died.
He said the Eggs were Cargo, The Derelict did not crash it was forced to Land because one of the cargo eggs, yes he said definitively the Eggs were Cargo and one of the eggs let loose a creature that developed inside that ship and killed him, The Jockey from within..
Completely and 100% definitely ending a 33+ year debate over it all !!!
April 25, 2012
Me too man, Me too...
SING IT RINGO !!!
[b]I get by with a little help from my friends...
gonna try with a little help from my friends...
ooo I get high with a little help from my friends...[/b]
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v234/LT.HIGHTIMES/1a1rockcat.gif[/img]
April 25, 2012
[quote]I'm glad to see you're not so horrifed by that two ship concept anymore Spartacus...you were very Hulk like in your anger...[/quote]
------------------
What bothered me about it is that that ship IMO is so Incredibly Unique that this sullies the uniqueness...never the less, it is Ridley's Piece to play with not mine and I have to accept it now! All the same I am sure he found a way to make that work...it's just that for 33+ years that Ship has been like a LOVER of mine. It is like finding out the Girl you thought was one of kind is actually a
Frikkin' LOL...[b]"REPLICANT"[/b]
April 25, 2012
I get that...with all this new info and especially the skull dome shot, I couldn't me more excited...again...
April 25, 2012
Nice to see Ridley talking one on one, opening up somewhat, although I still have reservations about facts after the fact. I'm more inclined to take the film as it was when I saw it, but I can understand reasons why he has brought this out now.
April 25, 2012
Spartacus, I'd been wondering why you seemed so bummed out by the "2 ships" eventuality, and now I finally get it. You wanted it to be a one-off......probably because the original design [i]is[/i] so original, and well,........[i]alien[/i]. I can understand why that bothered you.
Revisiting what were once intriguing unknowns, runs the risk of eliminating them......but I imagine that for every mystery explained, at least a couple of new questions will be raised. There's no need to dot every i or cross every last t of expositional plausibility, when you're dealing with what could easily appear to us, just like magic.
Actually, we've already seen an example of that in the scene where the SJ ship slams into the ground, but doesn't essentially disintegrate into bits and pieces. There's absolutely no way we could build anything that large capable of surviving such an impact and remaining intact.
April 25, 2012
so very well said Artyoh, I could not agree any more than I do, the obsession has allowed my Ego and my love of this franchise and Scott & Giger and the late great Dan O'Bannon to run rampant with innuendo and speculation and hopes of these little details panning out exactly the way My Ego and I want them to be and because you guys are all so smart and call everyone on everything speculative and therefore am learning to keep myself in better check and just appreciate that is happening at all, because it truly is Their Gift, to us all, for our love and appreciation of the Franchise and the Film that started all of this. And it is Their Baby, not mime, best thing for me, Is to strap myself in and just enjoy the ride!!!
April 25, 2012
you were always on top of things Big "N" ! and It's Awesome to see you on so late at night!
April 25, 2012
Thanks Spatacus!
I admire your passion. I remember the first time I read and responded to one of your posts on this site. Ahhhhh...only 43 day to go. Goodtimes!
~N
April 25, 2012
@Spartacus
Check out my most recent topic, and tell me what you think...even if you think it's lame.
Thanks,
~N
April 25, 2012
remind what I was ranting about LOL....Tx Neurion, was hoping you could write a little something about yourself in your personal profile page so I could learn more about how that mind of yours works without you knowing about it, LOL!!!
April 26, 2012
ok, then Scott just has to explain HOW this huge rooms fit into the original derelict...
[URL=http://www.imagebanana.com/view/5az4kv37/d1.png][IMG]http://img7.imagebanana.com/img/5az4kv37/thumb/d1.png[/IMG][/URL]
April 26, 2012
i have 3 answers for this that no one can ever argue with, choose one or all.
1. a wizard did it.
2. star trek time space fluctuation, no more explanation necessary.
3. the space ship has a portal to the creepy ghetto south side of Narnia.
[img]http://i1213.photobucket.com/albums/cc465/clockwork_carrion/MM/basket_caseicon.jpg[/img]
[url=http://www.youcaring.com/medical-fundraiser/old-lady-barley-needs-your-help/88737]BarleysFund[/url]
April 26, 2012
I´m with artyoh and Kane77 on this.
Scott´s talk now is an adjustment to the needs of the new story he wants to tell. There is no way the huge egg´s chamber could be part of the derelict (I proved that in an early post using the measurements someone calculated about the Derelict and egg´s chamber sizes), and we know that it was there only because the Fox´s suits redlighted the "pyramid" scenario from O´Bannon script.
April 26, 2012
i hope that means you are on my side here snorkel
[img]http://i1213.photobucket.com/albums/cc465/clockwork_carrion/MM/basket_caseicon.jpg[/img]
[url=http://www.youcaring.com/medical-fundraiser/old-lady-barley-needs-your-help/88737]BarleysFund[/url]
April 26, 2012
Snorkelbottom,
I do agree, but observe that nothing in "Alien" mithology give hints of this kind of technology happening. This would be a huge departure of the "canon", since the "Alien" franchise happens to be very "naturalistic" in style.
April 26, 2012
sooo.... does that mean
1. wizard
2. star trek
3. narnai
or
4. you cant agree with one to make the reply as unfunny as possible
[img]http://i1213.photobucket.com/albums/cc465/clockwork_carrion/MM/basket_caseicon.jpg[/img]
[url=http://www.youcaring.com/medical-fundraiser/old-lady-barley-needs-your-help/88737]BarleysFund[/url]
April 26, 2012
Naturalistic in style, dont think so...
Bio-mechanic, host eliminating aliens.
FTL travel with no time dilation.
Synthetics mistaken for humans.
acid for blood.
No heat effect upon entering a planets atmosphere.
...the list goes on. Ridley has given us the facts, just like he did with the suit (eliminating arguments about fossilization, though they still continue), for those that have trouble with those facts just fill in the gaps with whatever theory you want.