Alien movie and TV series news website logo

EXPLANATION for Queen, cocoons, and Alien Deleted Scene.

Prometheus Forum Topic

taylor Caudle

MemberOvomorphMay 18, 20125223 Views25 Replies
Okay, So for anyone gettin all butt-hurt over the inconsistencies between the ORIGINAL alien life cycle, with the cocoons turning into eggs, an then the QUEEN in Aliens LAYING eggs- Is it not SO easy to believe, that the xenomorphs are designed to be able to REPLICATE eggs on their OWN, and then once their numbers grow a "Queen" is randomly spawned, (ala. Alien 3) so that she lays the eggs faster? Doesn't seem like such a stretch. To combine the two ideas. Instead of ONE or the OTHER.

Other discussions started by taylor Caudle

Replies to EXPLANATION for Queen, cocoons, and Alien Deleted Scene.

User Avatar
Grindolf
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
@colonelangus you prefer the Aliens to be Ants ?...more dynamic ? WHY?
User Avatar
Lexsidious
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
Some of you are suggesting that the queen from aliens was the one who laid the eggs in alien? That has never been suggested. So how would it have gotten to Hadleys Hope? Much like in alien...a single face hugger was the culprit. Either the chestburster coming from Newt's father was a regular drone or it was a queen. I like combining the two ideas. I've always felt Newt's dad's chestburster was a drone. Like in alien it created a nest. Turned its next victim into an egg. I believe if the nostromo hadn't been destroyed and Ripley not frying Brett and Dallas, that eventually Brett's facehugger would have attached to Dallas. In turn Dallas' chestburster would have been a queen. To me makes the alien more adaptable.
User Avatar
BigDave
Group: Member
Rank: Deacon
View Profile
Well the deleted Alien scene did touch upon a different way, but then it was not explained very much not even since the movie, it has just as many unanswered questions as the Derelict on LV426 etc.... Aparently the new creature (talking not one indigenous to LV 223 temple) but one thats created via a serries of events, is suposed to be simular to all of the creatures in Alien Franchise but as a combination.... it is also based off the Orginal Alien Script Star Beast... Not much more detail than that, but maybe it means this new creature is indeed part Xeno, Part Face Hugger....... etc Thus bypasses the Egg element and people changing into Eggs.

R.I.P Sox  01/01/2006 - 11/10/2017

User Avatar
B1-66ER
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
You could also explain the varying life-cycle behaviors through DNA programmed accelerated evolution. One of the characteristics of the Alien could be that as well as growing very fast upon post-gestational chest-birth the species itself evolves new reproductive abilities in response to varying environmental adversities thus making it an even-more perfect survivor. The Queen could in fact be one such evolution.
User Avatar
drogie21
Group: Member
Rank: Ovomorph
View Profile
I said something sort of similar in another thread about don't link Prometheus and Alien to ALIENS. People continue to talk about the queen idea. The queen idea was James Cameron's NOT Ridley Scott's. We can see from Prometheus that Ridley is no way going down that line. Aliens was good film but Alien is Ridleys own and Aliens shouldn't be accounted for when going to see Prometheus when it comes out. Do people get were am coming from?

Join the discussion!



Trending Searches
Join the Alien online fan community!

Join the Alien Fan Community!

Create your own profile, contribute & engage with other Alien fans!

Recently Active Forums
New Forum Topics
Recently Updated Pages
Latest Alien Media
Join the discussion!
Please sign in to access your profile features!
(Signing in also removes ads!)



Forgot Password?
Scified Website LogoYour sci-fi community, old-school & modern
Hosted Fansites
AlienFansite
PredatorFansite
AvPFansite
GodzillaFansite
Main Menu
Community
Help & Info
+

Sign In to contribute!