Sucker for the Spoiler

Well considering this is being extremely set up for a Sequel and RS is definitely interested in directing it, I would not make an assumption so quickly to think that the ship Shaw left in is the one found on LV-426.

Well, don't worry.... The wiki leak was fake.... Don't get ahead of yourself.... Oh and thank God it's a suit....

I haz a suit... it shiny too.

@NateBlitz How do you know that? By what we've seen, it seems legit...matches what the french critics said...

@ NateBlitz The WIKI leak is also not the only source of a plot summary... people DID go to the French Screening and have rehashed pretty much every possible detail you could ask for. Including an extremely detailed play by play of the opening sequence, and the very final scene. I would be hard pressed to say that at this point these things are false. By Friday we will know though, those Brits will tell us if these "leaks" are true or not.

@The High Priest... "I could never get over where they arbitrerally decided to turn the ancient Alien Jockey into a Suit??????? " My feeling exactly...

I have no problem with the Space Jockey being a Humaniod in a Suit, i do think there are some inconsistant problems with his size.... but thats from the Director who had Men in Jeans instead of Men in Tights... I think the Alien could have been better, and set hundreds of years prior, i have not seen the movie or read the spoilers but i assume that if we had 4 questions we would get 2 vague answers with 10 more questions. I thus think that while Lindelof has some good ideas, his influence on the movies plot and script is more so than Ridley and what ever Spaits worked on well there is so little left of it. Hence this movie would be more Lost....... in Space than a Alien Prequel. Lets pray that Ridley either gets rid of Lindelof and gives us some answers even if simple, in Prometheus 2.... or Fox do Prometheus 2 and consign Ridley to none Sci Fi. Sorry but Alien and Blade Runner was classic, if Prometheus becomes a big disapointment, its a big risk to do a Blade Runner 2.... better maybe to leave that franchise to be.

I don't know what to believe any more. There is a member of this forum called astroboy who claims to have seen the French media preview (I'm not saying I don't believe him) and he says that the Wikipedia plot was correct, but NGR01 on AVP has said there were some massive inaccuracies in the Wikipedia plot summary. So far NGR01 seems to be the most credible as he has answered every question put to him fairly quickly. I have to say though, I'm looking forward to seeing the film equally as much as before regardless of whether or not I've read the correct plot so far. @astroboy - If you read this, care to respond? Thanks

The last version of the wiki I read 8 hours ago was the real plot, with some minor mistakes like who went where and when. Many details are also left out or events are not explained like how Holloway is infected (I loves the way that happened, the scene is even in the trailers).