Forum Topic

Merc7
MemberOvomorphJune 07, 2012Seriously, I read his review and it was so cliche. He basically repeats everything Lindelof and Ridley said prior to the release; ''it's an interesting film because it's about who created us blablabla'' Same words from all other reviews just in a different order (or like Yoda would say; this movie is good - good, this movie is)
Since negative reviews are increasing every day, I bet FOX had to come up with an emergency plan. So, they know that a lot of people read his reviews, pays him a secret amount of money (and some hot porn chicks) to give this film 4/5 stars, even fox knew that 5 stars would give away their secret little collaboration to easily, who gives this film 5 stars?
There was no mention of the unfinished or broken script with all the plot holes. EVERY single review I've read so far honestly mentions this, but not Roger's.
His false review follows a strict pattern and doesn't want to answer the truth about the film; that the story sucked really badly.