was vickers a replicant ? circa tyrell

That's right!

I'm pretty sure that on the Lindelof/Spaights commentary, on PROMETHEUS, Lindelof states that Vickers is NOT a robot. There is also this: [url=http://www.totalfilm.com/features/11-questions-answered-by-ridley-scott-s-prometheus-commentary/is-vickers-a-robot-does-it-have-a-double-meaning-when-she-calls-weyland-father]Look here, no lube required[/url]

@Necronom 4; Yeah, I mentioned earlier Lindelof says she isn't a robot as well. I know that interview was on this site, but I can't find it. I wanted to link it. Thanks for that link Necronom, Ridley says there are no hidden robots in the movie. [i]Later, Ridley says of David... "They said, let's hide the fact he's a robot, and I said no. I've done replicants, there's been a trillion robots, let's just make him a company employee who happens to be a goddamn robot." There's no hidden robots in this film.~ Ridley Scott[/i]

I never said he was a replicant or anything to deflect the theory towards him instead. What I said was, Holloway wasn't shown being sick thats all I said nothing more. Wouldnt you suspect that maybe not everyone can get quite a severe case of cryo-sickness like Shaw did. Vickers is tough she had no siblings (they dont mention family) and no brother other than an android adopted son of Weyland. Dont be a NERD KNOW IT ALL!

For me the one fact of the movie that suggest she might be a replicant was the Med-Pod being designed for a man. With all of her determination, drive, single focus on running the Wayland Corp. why risk such an incredible voyage with no security in surviving this voyage? From what I can tell she doesn't seem to be an all in player at this game with out a safety net. I can understand Weyland playing for ultimate stakes. But Vickers? With all the resources at her disposal?

NO !!!!! Vickers was not a replicant. DUH !!! Just like Deckard was not a replicant, it's not on the screen.