Still Very Excited To See USA Opening Show
TheBlueMan
MemberOvomorphJune 06, 2012882 Views12 RepliesDespite some of the so-so reviews and feelings of disappointment among some viewers, I am still looking forward to watching [i]Prometheus[/i] when it opens here in the USA in a couple of days.
After reading a number of reviews here on the forums and on various sites around the internet, a couple of thoughts came to me about what I was expecting from the movie and how I'm going to try to judge the film.
1. [i]I never expected[/i] Prometheus [i]to be a direct prequel to[/i] Alien.
This was never my thought about the movie, and not something which I 'need' the film to fulfill. If [i]Prometheus[/i] does not end on the derelict ship with a chestburster coming out of the space jockey's chest, I'm ok with that. This was just not an expectation that I had and so I won't be disappointed if this is not the case.
2. [i]I want to judge[/i] Prometheus [i]for what it is, not what I think it SHOULD have been and not as a Masterpiece To End All Masterpieces[/i].
So, what is Ridley Scott trying to say in the movie? What is the point of the movie in and of itself, not as it ties-in to [i]Alien[/i] and not as a function of how it has or has not lived up to the hype?
There is a tremendous amount of material available about the movie online, with the viral marketing campaign. I've tried to follow most of it so that the movie will hopefully make more sense to me when I see it. Also, I've gone over the Greek Promethean myth for myself again, to be familiar with those references, too.
3. [i]I think it is a plus if a director does not come out and tell me every little thing explicitly. I think the better directors leave more up to the viewer and the not-as-good directors try to make everything 'too clear' to the audience, like the director doesn't trust the audience to figure it out for themselves[/i].
Ridley Scott has never been a filmmaker who just gives everything away. Think of [i]Blade Runner[/i], or even a film like [i]Legend[/i]. Ridley likes to have ambiguity in his movies and he likes to leave things somewhat opened-ended for the viewer so the viewer has to work to come up with their own conclusion. I see this as a strength, not a weakness.
Ridley Scott is a brilliant filmmaker. Not a perfect one, of course, but no one is. So, if a film he made doesn't make immediate sense to me, that might not be his issue, it could be mine. Maybe I'm missing something, or maybe there are some other angles I need to look into to understand what is being presented better.
I'm glad to join in the discussion here. I've been a lurker for some time and I'm eager to see the film in a few days.