Forum Topic

.
MemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 11:21 AMUnreal Movie Review: Prometheus
Published by Paul Tassi at 12:00 pm under Movies,Reviews
2.5 out of 5 stars
“What if you got to meet your gods, and didn’t like their answers to your questions?”
That’s a central quandary of Prometheus, and one that I can twist into my own thoughts about the movie itself.
“What if a god of sci-fi returned to the genre, and you didn’t like his movie?”
It’s a question that pains me to have to pose, but truly, Prometheus is far from the science fiction masterpiece that Ridley Scott’s Alien was. It’s visually gorgeous, but plagued with issues ranging from casting to script to a plot with too many loose ends and canonical sins to count.
Elizabeth (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie (Logan Marshall-Green) believe themselves to have made the discovery of a lifetime in 2089. They’ve connected a series of ancient artwork from Sumerian to Egyptian that points to a celestial visit from a very specific part of the galaxy.
Glad to see Serenity is still getting work.
Fortunately, NASA apparently makes great strides in the next eighty years, and a ship, Prometheus is commissioned by ancient trillionaire Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce in 200 year-old man make-up) to journey to the possibly life-sustaining moon in the far-away solar system.
The ship is captained by Janek (Idris Elba), managed by Weyland surrogate Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron) and maintained by the android David (MIchael Fassbender) who busies himself watching films from the 1960s while the rest of the crew lingers in hyper sleep.
What they find on the habitable moon cannot be discussed in depth without giving too much away, but suffice to say the “engineers” as they call them, purported to have hand-crafted the human race, had some secrets that are better left undisturbed.
The trailer is downright spine-tingling, but unfortunately that same feeling doesn’t translate into the film itself. While Alien was claustrophobic and terrifying, and Scott’s Blade Runner poetic and philosophical, Prometheus is none of the above. It’s almost too much of a blockbuster, extremely loud and flashy at times, but sadly, often a bit dumber and goofier than a film of this pedigree should be. It’s a frustrating collection of halfway decent pieces, but assembled in all the wrong order with a few that simply don’t fit at all.
Charlize Theron for Samus Aran.
Rapace and Marshall-Green seem immediately out of place as the two leads. They’re far outshined dramatically by Theron and Fassbender, but the script is doing them no favors either. A main issue that keeps cropping up is that people are constantly doing things and reacting in ways that don’t make a lick of sense. For example, Marshall-Green’s Charlie has just discovered the very first existence of alien life when he arrives at the moon and sees man-made structures. Rather than acknowledging the exceptional discovery for more than a few seconds, he gets drunk because the aliens are dead and can’t talk to him. Really?
There are just so many moments of bad scripting with Fassbender’s David switching between evil and good for no reason, or Charlize Theron’s Vickers being revealed as a superfluous character, and the treasured auto-surgery pod in her private quarters only works on males for story convenience. It’s matched by some pretty terrible sci-fi which includes the crew taking off their helmets as soon as they discover air with no worries about pathogens, and everyone touching everything at all times no matter how slimy, sticky or laced with fangs it is. Character motivations make little sense, and the plot creates more confounding questions than it answers by the end, and having a sequel on deck is no excuse.
The film doesn’t work from a canon perspective all that well either. Without saying too much about the monsters that are encountered, they’re such a wide spectrum of terrors that the threat becomes muddled and confusing. It’s never clear what the properties are of what’s being fought, and the film jumps across violent variants so quickly that more than one enemy type is never seen more than once.
Prometheus presents grand questions and ends with almost no answers. It’s kind of sad when Alien vs. Predator actually had a better explanation for the events of the first film than we see here. A few plot points could be forgiven if the film was balance by a solid script and great performances, but there’s nary a memorable scene to be found, and Fassbender’s David ends up being the only character with any sort of depth at all. The robot, mind you.
David would have actually made a better lead.
It’s not terrible, but it’s definitely not worth a thirty year wait either. It’s just the latest in Ridley Scott’s decade-long parade of lackluster films, movies that could have been great, but are just missing that intangible factor to propel them to true classic status like his past work. Prometheus burns up in the atmosphere, and it’s nothing a promised sequel will be able to make amends for.
2.5 out of 5 stars
16 Replies

Spartacus
MemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 12:25 PM@SpacyFreak;
we said that about every film that has been released since Alien, this one just didn't miss a beat IMHO and was WILDLY ENTERTAINING TO WATCH and just so we are clear, [u][i][b]It takes just as much LOVE to go to a web site and create a post to say you hated something as it does HATE, whatever you HATED provoked something in you that motivated you to do it, which means the film was far better than you even realized. !!![/b][/i][/u]

Spartacus
MemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 11:47 AMlmfao and twenty years from now, just like Richard Corliss of Time Magazine did, and who claimed "Alien" was a "Piece Of unqualified Crap" and then upon it's re release and re-mastering told the world it was a"Masterpiece", this guy will be swallowing his words and apologizing for his massive ignorance before long!!! And just to put in perspective how biased everyone who has the f'n nerve to even THINK this film was bad...it MADE BLADE RUNNER LOOK LiKE A BORING UN ENTERTAINING PIECE OF GARBAGE !!! it made "The Avengers" look like Toy Story ! IT Made "Aliens": Look like a pathetic Soldier Wanna be Cesspool of stupidity! It made Resurrection and the Entire AVP series including the first Predator look Weak & Back Sliding and cowardly...I see the problem this film presented that the people who did not like it just could not handle clear as freaking day now...it was made for ADULTS...it had a BIG BOYS ARE ALL GROWN UP NOW message...I challenged everything you thought about Religion! aaaaaaaaaaahhh no one answered my left over questions form Alien boo hooo boo hoo, bla bla bla bla bla you all sound like a bunch of Babies!!! Grow Up !!! It was BY FAR the most entertaining film to be released by anyone on almost 15 years at least!!!
& of course, please feel free to show me the WORK YOU HAVE DONE THAT"S ANY BETTER...just LMFAO !!!
THUS ENDETH THE LESSON !!!

spacyfreak
MemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 12:19 PMYoyo, its not bad - compared to lots of other stuff.
But it had get so much better with some little changes.
Not sure if people in 30 years will talk about prometheus any more...
In cinema, nobody was CLAPPING at the end.
Everybode was just CONFUSED. I did not feel this "satisfaction" that you feel after seeing a really great movie. So SOMETHING went wrong.
We were so wrong!
We can talk it nice, and it has its good scenes, compared to Skyline and Battleship it is the masterpiece of the century (if you even CAN compare prometheus with such crappy-shitty-dumb-sci-fi-plots) but all in all its sad, according to the expectations and the long wait for return of ridley scott from his russelcrowe-advantures...

Acidforblood
MemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 12:16 PMI agree with patch!...there were too many holes..and I have the feeling that the movie didn't took his time...I agree 100%..wenn patch writes about the reactions of the different characters...It doesn' feels right!...I'm really a huge fan of alien...but Prometheus let me a void!!!!...too bad!...they had so much time to have the plot right..man...I have the strange feeling that "lindy"..rushed things...like:"..we can do this..and than that...and after he comes in..and than it explodes..and before that he comes out...and so on!"...I mean he talks like that...and maybe he pushed the story in this way..I know that Ridley is older..and maybe he let take himself from this vertigo..of uncontroled ideas...maybe?!;)

Acidforblood
MemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 12:29 PMAnd for the Record ..It doesn't matter if in 30 years people will talk in a positiv way about prometheus..like I will be 60....man!....before Alien there weren't exemples like it...was something new..that's why people took time too like it...now 2012 we have a lot of basics..and I just wanted a good movie...and I mean Now...and appreciate it because is a good movie and not because...maybe in 30..or 40...100 years people will talk about it...;)

Inquisitor Tremayne
MemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 1:07 PMeven if the people investigating this alien planet were not just stupid, it would still only be a mildly entertaining poorly done movie! i think i'll watch Supernova tonight to cleanse myself of thoughts of Prometheus!

rubinis
MemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 1:24 PMA.I. was a good movie and i can`t understand why there is people who didn`t like it. It was sophisticated story and with deep philosophy. Very touching movie, with many layers. I can find in it a lot of questions and i definitely want to think upon them. There is a few more movies even better than A.I.
Prometheus on the other side is with primitive script with a lot of irrelevant questions and i don`t feel the need to thing about them. So why the engineers want to destroy us. I don`t care because i will see it in the next sequel maybe. Why i must think about that ? This is not a deep question. Deep questions stuck in your brain and you think upon them and try to find your answer. You speculate with the answers that Lindelof will give you in the next sequel. How deep is this? I really wanted this movie to be epic. Not to be very intelligent, just epic but it`s not.

Cypher
Co-AdminMemberOvomorphJun-11-2012 7:13 PMI enjoyed it for what it was, but I wouldn't call it an instant classic. It may become a cult hit over time, especially if a sequel is released. I'm giving it 3/5, or 6/10, depending on which scale you use :-P
[url=http://www.robocopmovie.net/][img]http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac89/snorkelbottom/NewRoboBanner.jpg[/img][/url]
"Is it dead this time?" "I dunno, poke it with this stick and see."

Nuone
MemberOvomorphJun-13-2012 2:37 PMI wish Spartacus would get off Ridley's jock.
Patch, your review was absolutely spot on. We need not wait decades to see if a movie will become a classic. What makes movies instant classics are how fluidly and what makes the movie comes together. See "Inception", "Slumdog Millionaire", "Transformers", "District 9" (more so for originality, and a great lead), etc.
Alien, in 1979, was a commercial success, despite mixed reviews. Prometheus appears to be on track to just break even. Should be an indication of people's disappointment and or confusion.
Spartacus, you are one overzealous dude when it comes to Ridley man. Really, get a grip.

fluke
MemberOvomorphJun-13-2012 4:56 PMit had potential at the start but just turned into a stupid b movie.

niverik2k
MemberOvomorphJun-15-2012 8:27 PMI think the point he made about looking at it later is true to Blade Runner. It was not looked at favorably until the directors release. I know there was footage that was left out, and I think the footage that was left out would have made the movie longer and slowed the pace down, which is a complaint I hear a lot.
Some of the things that you mention as bad character choices are bad decisions, but some make strong implications about the characters. Charlize might be an android, there are lots of hints that way. I did think that the characters could have been more amazed by what they discovered, and some of them made odd character decisions.
The films supports the ideas that they presented. If you don't care about the ideas presented, that's up to you, but you wouldn't care about them If the two guys left in the cave died running instead of acting stupid.
When directors come back to their old work, it's never as good. Look at Star Wars, or Indiana Jones. I knew this coming in, so I was hoping that it wouldn't be bad, and it really wasn't. This version of the film wasn't a masterpiece, but it wasn't a complete dud either.

EGR101
MemberOvomorphJun-15-2012 8:52 PM@Spartacus: calm down dude. The guy is probably a troll
The people who stick around after the movie opens are either lover of the film or disappointed by still intrigued by the positive aspect of the film. If they thin the film is bad, they wouldn't bother hanging around here.
Add A Reply
Join the discussion! Sign in using your Scified Account to add your say!
New to the site? You can create your own profile in seconds!
* Signing in also removes ads *